User talk:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT

Crupet

Merci pour avoir mis cette image sur Wikimédia Commons! J'aimerais voter pour sa inclusion comme photo de qualité ; pourtant, la résolution pourrait être meilleure. Puisqu'on construit un fonds d'images pour l'avenir, il faut que la résolution de nos images soit très haute. Peut-être pourriez-vous nous donner une version de votre photo avec une résolution plus haute. --Zantastik 21:03, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Votre proposition de vote pour l’image [1] me fait réellement plaisir et m’encourage vraiment à publier mes photographies dans Commons. Malheureusement je ne possède plus le format original 2272x1704 de cette image. En effet habitué à insérer mes images dans des articles WIKIPEDIA (fr, en, nl et wa) et poussé à réduire le format de mes images à 120 Ko maximum par l’administrateur du site wa, j’ai réduit le format de cette image et je l’ai malheureusement sauvegardée sous ce format sans garder une copie de la photographie originale. Votre message aura eu le grand mérite d’attirer mon attention sur le problème de qualité maximum des photographies à envoyer et je ne manquerai pas de suivre vos conseils. Pourriez-vous me dire quel est le format idéal ?

Merci d’avance et à bientôt sur le net j’espère !

Jean-Pol

JPGrandmont 07:18, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Belgium cities/villages photos

Thank you for providing pictures on Commons.

Please put them into Category:Cities and villages in Belgium only or better into category about specific city/village. Just for avoiding Category:Belgium's overcrowding.

EugeneZelenko 13:40, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

About some images you uploaded

I think that images of a mushroom of one specie should be in a page (like Boletus edulis or Clitocybe phyllophila, each inserted in their category: family <- fungi_by_family <- fungi) and they shouldn't be in a category like Ascocoryne sarcoides or Boletus edulis inserted in fungi.

--Qualc1 19:07, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Answer

I have answered you in my discussion page

--Qualc1 12:39, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Vos imådjes

Dj'a djustumint veyou co sacwantès imådjes ki vs avoz saetchî. Ele sont foirt beles. Proficiåte! Dji n'sapéve nén ki vos avoz stî a Carcasone, savoz. - Waelsch 19:43, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Todi la? Dj'a djustumint veyou vos novelès imådjes. Waelsch 16:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Cathédrale de Tournai

Bonjour, dans une question posée à l'Oracle, un visiteur souhaiterait une "photo en couleur du vitrail de la cathédrale de TOURNAI représentant le "poids public"". Auriez-vous cela dans vos cartons ? Merci pour lui :) --Neuceu 16:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Derivative work

As far as I know, photos of statues in public space are allowed based on "panorama freedom", so I removed speedy deletion request on them. If you don't agree with that, plese make regular delation request. A.J. 14:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• Hmm... panorama freedom does not apply to some countries... :/ sorry for the mess, I reverted myself A.J. 14:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Quality Image

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musa JPG01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

—JeremyA 23:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Orcival JPG01.jpg and Image:Trois-Ponts JPG01.jpg

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --gildemax 15:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Medieval churches in Belgium | Category:Churches in Belgium

Hi Jean-Pol, Category:Medieval churches in Belgium is a subcat of Category:Churches in Belgium. I would therefore recommend that one cat (esp.: Category:Medieval churches in Belgium ) is enough. Greetings --Wst ^question 14:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

(insert)

I do not agree with you because :

• 1. you do not have proceed on the same way for others photographies of the category ?
• 2. you have lay in the main category some photographies who have nothing to do there ?
• 3. you do not have lay at least one representative photography in the main category ?

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 18:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

I have moved all photographs from Chapels of Belgium to Chapels in Belgium (both categories were created by you anyway), now everything is together in one category. I chose the in version, because most subcategories of category:Chapels by country used this version.

Salut, --LimoWreck 21:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Geocoding

Hello Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, at the Geocoding project we have noticed that you uploaded a number of pictures from one of the less covered regions on earth. Maybe you could consider adding coordinates to some of your images. They will show up on the WikiMiniAtlas and the Google Earth Commons-layer. You can find instructions on how to add coordinates to your images at Commons:Geocoding. Thank you in advance! The Geocoding team --EugeneZelenko 15:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I think procedure is not too hard :-) You just need to find subject on the hight resolution map (like http://maps.google.com) and add {{Location dec}} or {{Location}} in image description. Everything else will be done automatically. Of course, subject location on map will take some time... --EugeneZelenko 14:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for participating! I'm curious of the geocoding of one of your images however. The geocoding history for Image:Redu AEaJPG.jpg goes:

50°9′33″N 5°8′35″E - Your original 50°0′27.2″N 5°9′34.1″E - My correction based on Google Earth satellite imagery 50°0′27.2″N 5°9′38″E - Your latest change 75m from the corrected location

Now, I've never been there, but comparing the photo to the satellite image, the building is the C shaped one. Your change puts the location to the other side of the nearby square. I wouldn't be so interested of a single image otherwise, but I'm curious of the difference in our coordinates. Which map service are you using for the data? Je comprends français aussi si ça va mieux. --Para 18:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for checking, it indeed looks better now. I was only afraid that there would be online map services giving different coordinates for the same place, but I'm glad it wasn't the case. I marvel at this new possibility of seeing satellite images, and enjoy trying to find the camera location for photos. I think you're doing a good job too, after some verification. :) Merci et bon continuation!

J'ai oublié vous mentionner la façon la plus façile pour créer les coordonnées. Moi j'utilise Ald-Hjl-Koord-en.kmz (il s'ouvrira en GE), qui me permet de copier le modèle rempli en format wiki, après avoir deplacé l'object au centre d'écran. Bien simple. --Para 08:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Walloon Region

Bonjour,

Juiced lemon essai d'introduire dans la structure des catégories la notion des régions et des communautés. Il a ajouté Category:Walloon Region et Category:Flemish Region. Il a aussi changé une bonne partie des noms des catégories des provinces wallonnes.

En ce qui concerne le Category:Flemish Region, nous avons déjà demandé une deletion (voir Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Flemish Region et c'est clair que personne veut de cette complexité supplémentaire.

Dans un deuxième temps, il y a quelqu'un qui a ajouté Category:Walloon Region à la nomination de deletion, mais je ne sais pas si cette procédure sera accepté.

De toute façon, je considère que vous êtes un wikipedian très important, si pas le plus important en Wallonie, donc je ne suis pas chaud pour prendre une position avant de connaître votre avis (sur la nomination Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Flemish Region).

Pourriez vous aussi me communiquer votre avis sur le changement des noms des provinces: si vous êtes d'accord, je pourrais faire la demande au bot d'effectuer les transferts.

Cordialement. --Foroa 18:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Bonjour, Votre support sur Category_talk:Churches_in_Belgium#Resolution_september_2007 serait fort apprecié.

Je ne dis pas que la situation est gravée en pierre, mais je trouve que ces choses ne doivent uniquement changer ensemble et après un consensus entre les fournisseurs Belges d'images, pas parce qu'il y a quelqu'un qui décide de le faire autrement dans son coin. --Foroa 08:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Email

Beste Jean-Pol Grandmont,

hopelijk vind je het niet erg dat ik in het Nederlands schrijf... Ik ben de webmaster van deze website over mammoetbomen, waar ik al jaren alle mammoetbomen (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in België probeer te inventariseren en waar ook een overzicht staat van de dikste bomen van België (deze met de grootste omtrek) ([2]). Misschien bent u deze website al eens tegengekomen.

Op deze pagina's heb ik ook af en toe enkele van uw foto's gebruikt en hiervan had ik u graag op de hoogte gesteld. Ik had u graag ook een email gestuurd met een paar kleine vraagjes (kan u mij eens uw emailadres laten weten of dit in Wikimedia inschakelen bij "My preferences"?)

Cordialement, Tim Bekaert (User Tbc)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rendeux AR1bJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

showcasing your photos

I just wanted to comment that I liked very much your pictures, and I'm showcasing a few of them on my blog [3]. I saw on the image pages you wanted email if someone reused your images, but then you don't have email enabled. Let me know if I attributed properly your work and if there's any problem. -- Drini 23:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Stropharia aeruginosa JPG1a.jpg

---

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. GeorgHH • talk   13:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Category

Hi!, can you tell me which of your photos were categorised by me? Here are recent changes on all your photos in last 7 days. Regards, Yarl ^{Talk • PL} 16:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, I'll correct it. Yarl ^{Talk • PL} 17:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Abbaye de Floreffe

D'abord mes félicitations pour la qualité de vos photos. J'apprécie tout particulièrement la grande variété de vues d'églises et d'abbayes de Belgique (Wallonie). J'ai créé l'article sur l'abbaye de Floreffe et me suis permis de l'illustrer avec votre photo. J'espère que c'est okay. J'avoue ne pas m'y retrouver dans ces règles de copyright de Wikicommons. Merci pour vos belle contributions. Zerged 4 février 2008

Li Pontia

Bonsoir. OK, la category:Li Pontia ayant été créée (pas par moi), je m'étais dit qu'y mettre la photo en question n'était pas absurde. Rien n'interdit d'ailleurs de catégoriser à la fois dans Li Pontia et dans Huy. Lykos 18:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

geo localisation

Bonjour Jean-Paul. J’aime beaucoup tes photographies, mais j’ai trouvé geo localisés près de Bavay deux photo de Dinant (Rocher Bayard et les Rivaves). J’ai fais la correction. Utilises-tu Google-earth ? Jean-Louis Hens (talk) 08:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Géo

Jean-Louis,

Merci pour ton message et ton aide. J'utilise en effet Google Earth mais dans le cas relevé j'ai plus que certainement été distrait.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Félicitation

Bonjour,

Je trouve que les photos que vous avez prises pour Mons sont très belles et très réussies ! Vos photos mettent en valeur la cité du Doudou et la Wallonie. Merci !

vi:User:Dragon de Mons

juste pour vous le dire

Je viens de placer deux de vos photos sur l'article château de Grand-Bigard. Bonne journée--Rosier (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Gallery

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que vous avez régulièrement ajouté une "galerie" dans la description de vos photos, comme ici ( [4] ).

Mais les derniers jours, quelqu'un est en train d'effacer ces galeries. [5], [6], etc, etc... (entre autre, il efface également les titres pour marquer la description, la licence, etc). Je trouve ça étrange qu'on efface tous ces informations ajouté par un autre utilisateur (ajouté par vous dans ce cas), sans commentaire, sans informer, ou sans demander. C'est pourquoi j'ai défait beaucoup de ses changements... Je ne sais pas quels sont les intentions de cet utilisateurs, mais j'ai voulu quand-même faire cette petite remarque sur votre page de discussions, afin que vous poussiez contrôler ce que certains utilisateurs sont en train de faire avec vos images (ou les descriptions), si ça vous intéresse. Cordialement ;-) --LimoWreck (talk) 19:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagus sylvatica JPG2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good colour and composition --Böhringer 08:23, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

License change to File:Relieur JPG01.jpg

In your recent edit to File:Relieur JPG01.jpg, you changed the license tag from cc-by-2.5 to GFDL|cc-by-3.0. It is permissible to add new licenses but, sorry, it is not generally permissible to revoke a license. (See "What if I change my mind?" in the Creative Commons FAQ.) In effect, your edit added a license and now neither can be revoked and anyone can choose which one they prefer. I have listed both licenses in the "Licensing" section for the photo. —Danorton (talk) 13:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Ça, c'est ce que la majorité des administrateurs de Commons veulent nous faire croire ; mais au final, nous sommes tous des « juristes en herbe » qui ne lisons pas assez les licences. Je suis en train d'essayer de te défendre sur Commons talk:Licensing#Prohibit revoking license. →Diti the penguin — 13:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

I hope that he doesn't need "defense." My only aim is to help and properly describe the image and its licenses. If I have made a mistake, I am more than happy to correct it. In the instance of File:Relieur JPG01.jpg, the license originally selected was cc-by-2.5 which is a perpetual license. In assigning that license he waived his right to subsequently revoke it. While Commons allows for certain specific restrictions, it doesn't allow for subsequent license revocation. I am happy to provide more information or to be informed with more accurate information. —Danorton (talk) 14:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Je demande à ce que la dernière licence soit respectée car c'est mon droit jusqu'à preuve du contraire.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 21:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The first license you agreed to was cc-by-2.5, an English-language license detailed here. This is a perpetual license:

3.   License Grant. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright) license to exercise the rights in the Work...

The license states that you can revoke ("withdraw") the license under certain specific circumstances, but you have not described any such circumstance. I don't intend to criticize you or to defend Commons policy, but only to accurately and fairly reflect the facts. —Danorton (talk) 03:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't think the meaning of “perpetual” should be taken 100% accurate here. Let's imagine the author publishes his work under a CC-by-nc license. According to you, the fact that this license has near-infinite copyright terms would mean that latter uses of the work under a less restrictive license would be prohibited. Are they, actually? No. For me, what you are trying to do is to interpret the license terms so that you can justify your changes and chose the free license that you like (sorry for the bolded text, I'm not attacking you, I just want to give my text a better impact ;). Maybe I'm wrong, but try to understand what the uploader thinks of your acts. Creative Commons licenses aren't selective based on their level of freedom. PS: oops? :D →Diti the penguin — 06:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not following your argument as it applies in this instance. What's not true here?

1. The author has assigned two licenses to this item, both of which are perpetual and non-revocable.
2. Anyone may use either license.
3. The page truthfully and accurately lists both licenses and indicates that anyone may use the license they prefer.

—Danorton (talk) 20:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Important proposal

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Photographe

Monsieur.

Après avoir découvert votre page sur Commons, je me suis permis de vous inclure dans ma rubrique "D'autres photographes talentueux" sur ma page Commons.

Cordialement.

--ComputerHotline (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Laeken Se1aJPG.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laeken Se1aJPG.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fagus sylvatica Purpurea JPG4a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fagus sylvatica Purpurea JPG4a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Morlanwelz-Mariemont

I try to get all the botanical pictures off the park, only in the category:"Parc de Mariemont". This is a subcategory off "Morlanwelz-Mariemont" and "Parks in Belgium". Now the pictures of Morlanwelz-Mariemont wich have nothing to do with the park are drowned. Examples File:Mariemont sporen.JPG, File:Mariemont Splitsing.JPG and File:Mariemont tunnel lijn 30.JPG. In principle there the number of categories of a file should be limited. A picture should either be in the main category or a subcategory but not both.

Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Transcluded user templates with embedded license templates

Hi Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

There is an issue with your user license and Commons policy. I have drafted a post about it here: User:Slaunger/Sandbox/COM:AN message, which I intend to post on COM:AN shortly. Since your user name is mentioned explicitly, I thought you should have a possibility to preview it and possibly correct any factual mistakes. Cheers, --Slaunger (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Jean-Pol, Its seems like virtually all users I contact, which have followed the same process is willing to change it such that the templates are in accordance with Commons policy. Therefore it seems unlikely that the policy will be changed, and since you have also asked for assistance to fix your user template, I thought we as well might get started. In relation to that I would like to ask you if it is OK if I create two subpages in your user name space, User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/My and User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/MyLicense. The first one will basically be a copy of Template:Jean-PolGRANDMONTCredit with the license extracted, and the second one will be the /My user template side by side with the license templates. The latter will be the one you should use in the future using

{{subst:User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/MyLicense}}

on your file pages. Once I have made that and you have approved that it looks OK (using a single file page as a test), we could schedule a job at a bot operator replacing all occurances of {{Jean-PolGRANDMONTCredit}} with {{subst:User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/MyLicense}} on your 2800 file pages.

If this all seems a little overwhelming, don't dispair. We will do it step by step such that you can follow the process and get a good understanding of the changes I would like to make.

Just reply here. I am watching.

Cheers, --Slaunger (talk) 19:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Jean-Pol, I am back and ready. I have now extracted the license template from you user template and placed it in User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/Credit. this is a template which will continue to be simply transcluded into your image pages, and you can maintain it centrally. It is used in User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/License alongside with a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. (Note that I selected slightly different subpage names that I originally proposed, I think the names used here are better). Now, in the future you should add your credit template as well as the license by adding

Permission={{subst:User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/License}}

in your image pages in the {{Information}} template. As a test I have done this substitution manually in File:Conques JPG03.jpg. Please review if you are satisfied with the result (the substitution first generated two extra line breaks in the permission field, but I have now adjusted your new user templates such that they will not appear again). If you can confirm this kind of change I will make a test run with my bot on 20 of your image files. --Slaunger (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Test run with 20 template substitutions I have checked each one of them and they seem OK. Can I proceed provided I get the bot flag I have requested? --Slaunger (talk) 23:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I have to hold my horse though until a bureaucrat comes by and gives me a bot flag on my bot request. --Slaunger (talk) 20:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Jean-Pol, the bot flag has been granted, and I have initiated my first job, which will replace your old user template on 1000 image pages of your this evening. The remaining pages will be done tomorrow. --Slaunger (talk) 20:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Jean-Pol. I am not completely done yet though. I did +1000 replacements yesterday, and 1000 replacements two days ago (I have committed myself to limit the bot to about 1000 edit per day), but there are still 300-400 replacements left (which I anticipate will be done later this evening (if my wife does not turn off my PC again, while it is working - arrrgh )). Once all transclusions of {{Jean-PolGRANDMONTCredit}} has been replaced by the new ones, I would like to nominate it for deletion, just to get rid of it once and for all. --Slaunger (talk) 13:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done with all 2754 template replacements. I will now nominate your old template for deletion. --Slaunger (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Once again thanks!!

http://www.wereldpagina.nl/index.php/Bestand:Bas-Languedoc_Carcassonne.jpg

Photographers Blackbelt

		THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
		J'ai l'honneur de vous décerner la Photographers Blackbelt (ceinture noire des photographes) pour vos photos remarquables et excellentes. --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bürstegg Biberkopf.jpg

I have uploaded a new version of this picture! Maybe you would like to change your vote! --Simonizer (talk) 06:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Watermill

Hello, I used your image of the Hotton watermill in an article I wrote for a children's magazine. You asked to be sent a copy of the article, but I can't find a valid e-mail address for you. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Charmilles

Cher Jean-Pol,
moi aussi, je ne trouve pas d'adresse courriel valable, donc j'écris ici
Merci beaucoup pour les images de charmilles
deux images sont incluses dans mon vidéo sur un poème de Paul Verlaine, j'espère qu'il vous plaira
Ariette Oubliée No 4
Amitiés
David
Dwsolo (talk) 15:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Ganoderma applanatum JPG1.jpg

Allô Jean-Pol!

Est-ce-que tu es sûr que c'est le Polypore aplani (Ganoderma applanatum). Je pense que c'est l'amadouvier (Fomes fomentarius). Ce champignon est très (trôp ?) épais/bouffi pour G. applanatum. La couleur n'est pas vrai aussi. Qu'est-ce que tu pense? (I think it is better to go on in English ;-)) --Toffel (talk) 22:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Scarlet Oak

I used your Scarlet Oak Picture in my State Trees Gallery.Thanks Vanessa - Trees & Shrubs at About.com

Gouvy

Hallo,

Please have a look at this comment

Les Meloures (talk) 23:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Image:Waha JPG00i.jpg

Hello Jean-Pol GRANDMONT!

Is this file your own work? Are you the photographer/author of this file? If yes, please insert {{own}} as source instead of nothing.

Thanks in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 09:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for File:Fraxinus syriaca JPG1Fe.jpg

Thank you for the image; used twice on the Hebrew wikipedia. RickP (talk) 18:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

FPC careless reviews

Hi Jean,

You may be interested in participating in this_discussion. Cheers, Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:06, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Warneton 051003 (8).JPG

Hello, I am trying to identify this gun in the photo you uploaded. Do you have any more information ? It looks like a 25-pounder but many details are different ! Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 13:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

It appears to be a modernised version of Category:Škoda 100 mm Model 14/19 which was used by many smaller European countries before and into WWII. I can't find any reference to Belgium using it or why it has been so carefully preserved. But Poland produced a similar version with modern pneumatic tyres : See http://www.afv-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/72755_0.jpg. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 17:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Congratulation

Congratulation Jean-pol for your remarkable contribution to the WP commons. By the way, are you not related to the Grandmont tribes of Forrières in Belgium. :-) Best wishes, Shinkolobwe (talk) 14:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Tribes of Forrières

Bonjour Jean-Pol, Merci de ta réponse. C'est par le bias de la spéléo que je connais votre tribu. J'ai eu tout récemment le plaisir de descendre encore avec BG. Je vais lui demander ton adresse email pour te contacter de façon plus personnelle. Sinon, demande lui la mienne: πR, :-)) Shinkolobwe (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Rebonjour Jean-Pol,

Merci de ton second message. Décidément, le monde est petit et nous sommes en pays de connaissance. J'ai bien connu Claude et aussi certains de ses cousins d'Andennes. Bonjour à la famille. Bien amicalement, πR, Shinkolobwe (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

L'identification du champignon

Bonjour, Jean-Pol!
File:Ganoderma applanatum JPG1.jpg - Cela non Ganoderma applanatum. C'est le Fomes fomentarius.
Bien amicalement --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Georges,

Je te remercie pour ton message. En consultant ma page de discussion, tu pourras constater que j'ai déjà débattu au sujet de cette identification en décembre 2009 avec Toffel et lui avais signalé que l'angle de prise de vue, ainsi que les conditions météo et de lumière avaient donné cet aspect d'épaisseur et de couleur verdâtre à ce spécimen ce qui rendait malaisée son identification au premier abord. L'étude des spores au microscope n'avait toutefois laissé aucun doute pour la détermination de l'espèce.

J'en profite puisque tu sembles être un spécialiste de l'identification des champignons sur document photographique, pour te demander si tu peux déterminer les champignons figurant sur les fichiers suivants:

• 
• 
• 
• 

  Fomitopsis pinicola

• 
• 

  Russula aeruginea

• 
• 
• 
• 

  Hypholoma sublateritium ?

• 
• 
• 

  Hypholoma fasciculare ?

• 

Amicalement et au plaisir de te lire,

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT

J'ai pu identifier deux seulement.

Très amical --George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Jean-Pol. Ajoutez une note sur l'identification par l'étude des spores au microscope à la description de cette image, s'il vous plait. Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Je continue à m'assurer que cela - "Fomes fomentarius". Le meilleur biologiste mycologist de russe et ukrainien Wiki communique assurément : ce ne peut pas être "Ganoderma applanatum" --George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Merci pour ta réponse partielle.

Comme tu as pu le constater, il est très difficile de déterminer l'identité biologique des champignons sur la simple étude d'un document photographique (deux identifications assurées et deux identifications sans certitude pour 16 images étudiées).

Avant de prendre position au sujet de l'image incriminée, j'attendrai donc que de plus amples informations me soient fournies par les spécialistes.

En effet, dans bien des cas, Il est prématuré de renommer une image sans en avoir parlé avec des personnes expertes en la matière. Cela est d'ailleurs également démontré par la discussion que j'ai eue en décembre 2009 avec Toffel.

Amicalement,

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT

Salut à tous aux participants de la discussion.

• La remarque 0. Je propose toutes les discussions de faire ici. Il ne faut pas copier sur d'autres pages de la discussion.
• La remarque 1. Je le biologiste non professionnel, cependant la science la biologie me plais beaucoup. J'ai lu beaucoup de livres de biologie (enseignement indépendant) et je tâche d'utiliser ces connaissances pratiquement. J'ai lu l'édition dans six volumes les in-folio de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS à l'âge de 11 ans. Je vivais parmi la nature sauvage la grande partie du temps et loin des villes.
• La remarque 2. Je faisais aussi les erreurs aux identifications et deux fois mes fichiers étaient rebaptisés et ont échangé la catégorie.
• La remarque 3. En 2009-2010 je voyais plus de centaine de fois les champignons Ganoderma applanatum et Fomes fomentarius. Ces deux champignons se rencontrent souvent dans les bois de l'Ukraine. Le champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" grandit d'habitude sur les arbres morts à côté de la terre (5-50 cm).

Sont suffisantes les négociations sur moi, maintenant nous regarderons le champignon.

• 

  typique Fomes fomentarius ~10 ans

• 

  ? ? ? champignon ~7 ans

• 

  le sombre Fomes fomentarius

• 

  typique "Ganoderma applanatum"

• 

  gris "Ganoderma applanatum"

• 

  typique "Ganoderma applanatum"

• Le champignon inconnu a les signes de l'âge approximativement 7 ans (un nouvel anneau chaque année). C'est un vieux champignon.
• Un vieux champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" toujours plat. Un jeune champignon arrive parfois le haut. C'est un vieux champignon.
• Un vieux champignon Fomes fomentarius a la forme du sabot.
• Le champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" de la couleur grise arrive très sec ou mort. Le champignon ? ? ? mouillé.
• Plus bas champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" d'habitude soulève la poussière beaucoup de la couleur rouillée brune. Je ne vois pas la poussière brune ici.
• Le champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" a un domaine blanc sans division en les anneaux. C'est l'accroissement en un an.
• Le champignon Fomes fomentarius a quelques anneaux clairs ces dernières années. Il s'assombrit lentement.

Tous les signes est recueilli ensemble => ? ? ? C'est une très bonne photo du champignon Fomes fomentarius.

C'est mes connaissances. Pouvez les contester et inviter les spécialistes. Je peux me tromper aussi.

Très amical --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Your description changes on file Arlon_E1_JPG.jpg

Hello,

Despite your changes having been reverted, why do you continue to silently push your own version of description with the wrong categories and less interwiki links, without giving your reasons? Thanks for your answer and for caring about others' work. Bjung (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Aquarelliste JPG03.jpg

Hello, I was wondering which castle we see here in the background. (I would like to add that to the Dutch article about watercolour painting.)

Muijz (talk) 17:51, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Use of images, Wallonia & Brussels magazine

Hello I'd like to use one of your photos of Château de Dave near Namur in the next edition of Wallonia & Brussels magazine, but like others on here, I can't find your email address to contact you. If we publish it, we will of course credit you. Best wishes.

Photo use permission

Mr. Grandmont,

I am writing from Common Ground -- a high school, urban farm, and environmental education in New Haven, Connecticut. Our students are currently wrapping up work on a series of outdoor interpretive exhibits for our site, developed in collaboration with the staff at the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. You can read a little about their work at www.commongroundct.org/lessons.php, if you are interested.

One of our exhibits will focus on different invasive species on our campus, and I noticed this great photo (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Acer_platanoides_1aJPG.jpg) of a norway maple that you took. I was wondering if it might be possible for our students to get permission to use some of these photos in their exhibit. We would, of course, be happy to provide a photo credit acknowledging your contribution to the exhibit.

Thanks for your time, and for your great work. I look forward to hearing back, Evan Walker-Wells ewalkerwells@gmail.com

Utilisation d'une photo

Bonjour,

je suis graphiste amateur et j'aurais aimé pouvoir utiliser une de vos photos de chêne pédonculé (File:Quercus robur JPG (d2).jpg) pour effectuer un montage pour mon usage personnel et l'exposer sur mon compte deviantart.

Amicalement,

Amandine (amande74@gmail.com)

Descriptions multilingues

Bonjour. J'ai utilisé le modèle multilingue {{LangSwitch}} --Ecummenic (talk) 15:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

GR-Atlas

Bonjour Monsieur Grandmont, J’ai utilisé quelques de vos photos trouvés sur Wikimedia pour l’illustration de notre projet de recherche GR-Atlas. Merci pour l'occasion de les utiliser.

Vous les trouvez sur les pages : Kathedrale von Tournai http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1641&Itemid=5

Belfriede in Belgien und Frankreich http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1640&Itemid=509

Hochschulwesen in Wallonien http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1635&Itemid=503

GK035 AGC Flat Glass Moustier http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1619&Itemid=477

GA041 1893: Gussignies - Roisin http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1467&Itemid=296

GK050 Gerresheimer Momignies S.A. http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=862&Itemid=392

Cordialement Malte Helfer, Université du Luxembourg

Use of your pictures in print

Hello, I'd like to use some of your photos in the next edition of Newcomer magazine. The photos are Braine-l'Alleud_JPG00a, Braine-l'Alleud_JPG01 and Overijse_JPG01a. If we publish any of them, we will of course credit you. Best wishes.

• Can you give me more details about your magazine ?

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Carpinus

Bonjour,Monsieur Grandmont, tout d'abord félicitations pour vos images. Elles expriment une grande sensibilité avec la nature. Habitant en France, en Sologne, terre de forêts et de bruyères, il serait bien possible que votre coup d'œil soit charmé par cette région. Je travaille sur un projet où l'arbre à une place prépondérante dans sa réalisation, notamment le charme (carpinus betulus), je souhaite créer un site internet en utilisant Carpinus betulus 'Fastigiata' JPG1.jpg pour illustrer ma page d'accueil, me concéder vous cette possibilité. J'apporterai juste une modification en enlevant les 2 personnages. Si vous le souhaitez nous pourrons ainsi échanger sur les passions qui nous animent. Stéphane

• Bonjour Stéphane,

Merci pour votre sympathique message. Il se pourrait fort bien que je passe par la Sologne, car je visite régulièrement diverses régions de France depuis pas mal d'années. De plus, la lecture de Raboliot m'a réellement passionné dans ma jeunesse et cela me pousse vraiment à mieux connaître toutes ces beautés décrites par Maurice Genevoix. En ce qui concerne l'utilisation de l'image sur votre site, je n'émets que les restrictions décrites par la licence (crédit photographique à l'auteur) et me demande pourquoi vouloir enlever les personnages de l'image puisque ceux-ci situent bien le cadre du parc dans lequel l'arbre a grandi. J'aimerais aussi connaître le lien vers votre site.

Bonne continuation et à bientôt.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Carpinus (suite)

Bonjour Jean-Pol, Je viens de prendre connaissance de votre message, et vous en remercie. Pour ce qui est des 2 personnages, ils s'inscrivent parfaitement dans la quiétude du lieu sous la majesté de ce charme, mais en fait, je souhaite mettre l'accent sur la majesté de cet arbre, sous ce magnifique contre-jour. Mon site ne sera pas créé avant 2 mois, et à ce moment je ne manquerais pas de vous adresser le lien. Pour ce qui est de la Sologne, le printemps et l'automne sont les périodes les plus magnifiques, avec un faible pour le printemps où les contrastes sont les plus forts. S'il était possible de converser autrement ce serait avec plaisir,mais n'ose laisser mon adresse mail. Nous pourrions échanger différemment, d'autant plus que ma voisine est une de vos compatriotes, de Waterloo... A bientôt peut être. Stéphane

Bonjour Jean-Pol, j'ai finalement réalisé les images de mon site moi-même sans la majesté du charme que tu avais pris. Je t'invite donc à découvrir www.billot-sologne.com A bientôt peut-être sur les chemins de Sologne. Stéphane

Vol de photos

Je me permet de te signaler des vols massifs de photos par http://www.infotourisme.net qui fait des fiches de communes françaises partiellement copiées de Wikipédia, avec photos, volées elles aussi. Comme tu fais beaucoup de photos, et qu'elles illustrent des pages de Wikipédia, tu es potentiellement concerné. Markus3 est "en plein dedans", il en parle ici, et au bistro de Wikipédia, suivre les liens. Cordialement, ----MGuf (d) 19:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Non respect des licences photos

J’ai constaté depuis longtemps le vol de mes documents sur de nombreux sites référencés par google mais aussi dans diverses revues et journaux. C’est pour cela que dans un premier temps et par réflexe de défense j’avais inséré le watermark que tu connais. La politique de Wikipédia ayant changé au sujet des licences acceptées, certaines personnes y ont vu très vite une source de profits à peu de frais puisque Wikipédia n’est pas à même de faire respecter le droit des licences qu’elle impose sur les documents importés par ses membres. Bien que je me sois fait une raison, je pense que ces règles nuiront à plus ou moins brève échéance à l’encyclopédie car beaucoup voient déjà d’un mauvais œil que leurs documents destinés aux nobles buts éducatifs d’une entreprise participative servent souvent à des fins uniquement commerciales.

Cordialement

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

"La politique de Wikipédia ayant changé au sujet des licences acceptées" : ah bon ? quel changements ? Hors exception (logo, timbres...) il n'y a sur Wikipédia que des photos de Commons, c'est "la politique" de Commons qui prime, elle n'a pas changé à ma connaissance.

"Wikipédia n’est pas à même de faire respecter le droit des licences" : ben non, c'est à l'auteur de faire respecter si il veux la licence qu'il a choisi.

C'est clair que celui qui refuse l'utilisation commerciale ne peut pas mettre son travail sous CC-By-SA !

Et à par ça, je n'ai pas compris ta position : tu baisses les bras et laisse quiconque voler ton travail ? Au contraire tu souhaites changer de licence pour PD-self ou CC0 ? Pas compris.

Et quelle attitude pouvons nous adopter quand on voit une de tes images volée ? Je sais qu'on n'a pas légitimité à agir pour autrui, mais on peut "conseiller" les fautifs ; il semble également qu'une procédure collective appuyée par Wikimedia France se mette en place prochainement pour tenter de résoudre le problème avec Infotourisme : souhaites tu t'y associer ? Cordialement, ----MGuf (d) 19:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Quercus castaneifolia

Hello - I work for a non-profit organization dedicated to bio-diversity conservation in the Caucasus. Quercus castaneifolia is a species endemic to the Caucasus, and we would like to use your photo on our new website, which we will be launching in the next two months or so.

I was unable to access your email information on Wikimedia Commons.

You can reach me at contact@caucasus-naturefund.org.

Merci!

It's OK for me, if the licence conditions are met. Please let me know the link to the website where the documents will be published.

P.S. I could not contact you at your email: contact@caucasus-naturefund.org.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 16:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/Credit

Hello Jean-Pol, I noted your template ("An email to Jean-Pol GRANDMONT would be appreciated"), and that you haven't enabled receiving e-mails here on Commons. Therefore the link Special:EmailUser/Jean-Pol_GRANDMONT in all your image descriptions only gives an error. Maybe you could fix this, either by enabling e-mail, or by adapting the template. Regards --:bdk: 23:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Files tagged as duplicates

Hi, I notice you have tagged 5 of your uploads (File:Burg-Reuland JPG001.jpg, File:Burg-Reuland JPG12.jpg, File:Burg-Reuland JPG02.jpg, File:Burg-Reuland JPG13.jpg and File:Abbaye ND de Scourmont JPG02.jpg) as duplicates after uploading copies / new versions of each of these images.

However there is one issue here: You originally uploaded the images under cc-by-2.0. The new uploads are licensed under cc-by-sa-3.0. Of course this is a free license, but it is more restrictive than the original release which was over 6 years ago. Two options to my mind here: If the new file is changed to a cc-by licence, the old one can be speedied or if you want to keep the more restrictive license, it should go through Commons:Deletion requests. Bear in mind Commons does not typically allow revocation of licenses, and that is effectively what would happen here.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC) }}

File:Mons 050424 JPG106.jpg (Marché aux fleurs à Mons)

Bonjour Jean-Pol.

De rien. C'est avec plaisir que j'ai adapté la traduction néerlandaise. La vôtre n'était pas erronée d'ailleurs, "zondagse bloemenmarkt" sonne simplement mieux...

Entre-temps, j'ai promu votre photo - après quelques hésitations dues aux détails surexposés (un effet pratiquement inévitable dans ces conditions de prise de vue). Mais j'aime beaucoup l'atmosphère printanière de l'image.

Bien cordialement, Marc (MJJR)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mons 050424 JPG106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice atmosphere; good sharpness and colors. Despite of some overexposed details (due to the contre-jour), this is QI for me. -- MJJR 09:33, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Brugge Koningsbrug R02.jpg

Bonjour Jean-Pol,
Merci pour la promotion 'QI' de ma photo de Bruges. J'allais juste réagir à votre demande concernant la procédure à suivre, mais je vois que vous avez trouvé entre-temps.
Cordiales salutations, Marc (MJJR)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpteur sur bois JPG02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ianare 21:02, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Missing template with identifier

Hello Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, It is a must to add to your uploaded files a template in what the number of the monument (identifier) is filled in. Otherwise submissions for Wiki Loves Monuments do not participate in the contest. Can you please make sure that your uploaded files have the monument-number in the apropiate template? For Flanders: Template:Onroerend erfgoed, for Wallonie: Template:Monument Wallonie and for Brussels: Template:Monument Brussels. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 00:15, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Hanvec - ossuaire - 002.jpg

Bonjour Thesupermat,

L'image susmentionnée est très jolie mais tu as oublié d'insérer la description. Dès que tu auras mis cette description, je voterai pour la promouvoir.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

 Done, merci d'avoir noté cet oubli, bonne journée. --Thesupermat (talk) 10:18, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

File:0_Verdun_-_Ossuaire_de_Douaumont_(1).jpg

File:0_Verdun_-_Ossuaire_de_Douaumont_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 12:04, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour,

En ce qui me concerne, je ne fais que veiller au respect du règlement pour wiki loves monuments, où il est indiqué que tout participant doit s'assurer que les différents droits doivent être respectés avant de poster une photographie sur Commons, même si certains de ces droits sont stupides. Ayant fort à faire avec WLM, je ne traîte pas les photos postées dans les autres cas.

Tu peux répondre par toi même à la question "pourquoi moi, pas les autres ?" que tu me poses indirectement : parmi tous les liens à droite de ta page, il existe celui marqué nominate for deletion. N'hésite pas à t'en servir si tu estimes que cela est nécessaire. En outre, n'hésite pas à écrire à ton député européen afin d'unifier cette fichue liberté de panorama, qui nous ennuie bien.

Cordialement, Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 13:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meise 060629 (24).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Gidip 18:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Ossuaire de Douaumont

Hello M. Grandmont,

Im sorry about the deletion request of your picture File:0_Verdun_-_Ossuaire_de_Douaumont_(1).jpg in the course of Wiki Monuments. But why did you request the deletion of unique contemporary historical documents like File:Bundesarchiv Bild 121-0365, Verdun, Besichtigung, Gedenkstätte.jpg ? So is mine (File:Douaumont ossuary during german occupation.jpg), at least i think so. Aware of the builders property rights, i dont't see the proportionality in this case of documents. Removing these files would be a great loss for wikimedia. Christian Ude (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

bonjour.

Inutile d'ouvrir un nouveau fil de discussion, c'est bien le sujet que je souhaite aborder en réponse à ton amical message. L'opportunité de la présence ou du maintien dans Commons de cette image ne fait pas de doute pour moi, évidemment. Je suis à cet égard du même avis que ton interlocuteur ci-dessus. La majesté funèbre et grandiose de ces lieux que je connais me parle aussi. L'aspect légal de la chose, au regard du droit français, m'incline plutôt à penser comme Trizek. Mais devant le consensus qui semble se dessiner (à mon avis sujet à caution, je le maintiens), je vais avec plaisir revenir sur mon opposition, qui n'était que juridique, mais ni technique, ni d'opportunité. Bien cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Glass manufacturing companies in Belgium

Hi, a few months back you created Category:Glass manufacturing companies in Belgium. It is advisable to give a category more than one parent category. In this case, there was no link with Belgium when browsing through categories. Please keep this in mind in the future. --Vera (talk) 18:06, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux - Le vieux château féodal (XIIe siècle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, even if the crop is a bit tight at right. I'll support when dustspot removed (please see annotation) --Jebulon 14:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)reworked.-- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 14:30, 6 September 2011 (UTC) Merci. Chose promise, chose due ! --Jebulon 16:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hélas... No FOP in France, I'm afraid (please see deletion request)--Jebulon 14:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC) It seems that the DR is going to be unsuccessful. Therefore I remove my opposition and nominate it for promotion, as I think that this picture is useful in "Commons", and a good quality one.--Jebulon 22:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Lompret - Village (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Soignies - Garde Impériale 2.JPG

Superb! (whatever happens at QI, I love it). NVO (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

QIC

Hi Jean-Pol,

did you made two times a mistake [7], [8] or did you want to promote all the three images? Greetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Ancien abattoir de Bergues

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à Wiki loves Monuments.

Cependant, la photographie File:0 Bergues - Ancien abattoir (1).jpg ne représente apparemment pas un monument historique protégé par le ministère de la Culture. Aussi suis-je obligé de la retirer du concours.

N'hésitez pas à ajouter d'autres clichés, en vérifiant bien que l'édifice concerné est un monument historique (identifiant Mérimée commençant par PA).

Bonne participation, cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

PS: de plus, sauf erreur de ma part, il y a erreur sur la commune dans le titre des fichiers : File:0 Bergues - Citerne de la citadelle (1).jpg, File:0 Bergues - Citerne de la citadelle (2).jpg, et File:0 Bergues - Robinet de la citerne de Freville.jpg. Puis-je renommer ces fichiers pour remplacer Bergues par Gravelines ?

Bonsoir,

Je t'en prie, si tu as d'autres questions sur les MH ou la base Mérimée, n'hésite pas à demander.

Je viens d'effectuer les trois renommages comme prévu.

Je viens aussi de clore en conservation la PàS pour ton fichier. Je trouve que c'est assez limite du point de vue légal ; mais après tout, c'est ton fichier, je te préviens juste que les éventuels problèmes légaux et juridiques sont entièrement sous ta responsabilité et à tes risques et périls.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 22:53, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Bergues - Hôtel de ville (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition--Someone35 11:43, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soignies - Garde Impériale 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me and usseful--Lmbuga 21:46, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Maybe QI, but not really useful, they are too many uniform errors. --Jebulon 22:33, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Mozet - Ferme de Basseille (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments quality could be better (artefacts visible), but for QI okay IMO --Taxiarchos228 08:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Aubechies - Église Saint-Géry (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:51, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Lobbes - Collégiale Saint-Ursmer (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 13:03, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Bergues - Ancien mont-de-piété (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice light --Ralf Roletschek 10:10, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 La Hestre - Drève de Mariemont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice colors --Ralf Roletschek 12:41, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Château de Celles (Houyet)

Bonsoir,

Merci de ta confiance.

J'ai tenté quelque chose, mais ne suis pas entièrement satisfait du résultat. à toi de voir. Si ça ne te convient pas, ne te prive pas de revenir à ta version, je n'ai pas d'amour-propre d'auteur !

De toutes façons, il y a un gros problème de surexposition du ciel tout à fait en haut à droite et que je n'ai pas pu régler, qui me parait rédhibitoire en QI.

C'est toutefois un bien joli site !

Bien cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 22:41, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mons St2aJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the background should be brighter in my opinion --Someone35 11:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Grille du Théatre royal de Mons.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Mariemont Fontaine des lions 101225 (1).JPG

Salut !

Tu m'as bien fait sourire avec ton catalpa, c'était très sympa et amusant !!--Jebulon (talk) 23:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Ce petit mot pour te dire que ta Fontaine aux Lions visée dans le titre penche un peu à gauche, tu devrais peut-être la redresser.

Ne va pas à Grenade pour voir l'original, il est encore pour longtemps démonté et en restauration, j'ai été bien déçu.

Mais si tu ne connais pas cette ville, alors je t'engage vraiment à y aller, elle est merveilleuse (quelques images dans ma galerie).

Amicalement,--Jebulon (talk) 23:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our E1bJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 11:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mohiville Mo1bJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 11:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Serres Royales de Laeken (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 11:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thoricourt PH1JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mons St2aJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the background should be brighter in my opinion --Someone35 11:17, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Grille du Théatre royal de Mons.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Aubechies - Église Saint-Géry (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Someone35 13:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 La Bruyère (Beauvechain) - Ferme de Wahenge (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 10:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Gembloux - Palais de l'ancienne abbaye St-Pierre (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Airwolf 21:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Opprebais - Moulin (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Jakubhal 20:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walcourt - Parclose - Satire d'une nourice.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Walcourt - Miséricorde - Deux personnes déféquant.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 16:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

QIC

Jean-Pol, merci pour les mots encourageants. A mon tour, je prends plaisir à suivre l'apparition de tes photos sur la page QIC. Cordialement, --Cayambe (talk) 14:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Moulbaix - Moulin de la Marquise (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 04:14, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Huy - Grand'Place (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 20:45, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Mons - Hôtel de ville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add geotag --Cayambe 17:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)) Done, OK seen and made. -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 17:44, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moulbaix MV1fJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment visible flash at the bottom of the image, blurry wooden bar in the top, you may want to crop it--Someone35 17:09, 18 September 2011 (UTC) Done, OK seen and made. -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 15:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC) k, QI now

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariemont Fontaine des lions 101225 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 13:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Château d'Havré (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but looks like it is tilted clockwise --Someone35 13:09, 19 September 2011 (UTC) Done, OK seen and made. -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 14:54, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celles (Houyet) - Château de Vêves (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Un peu jaune et un peu pâle, non ? Améliorable.--Jebulon 17:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)  Done, but now I cannot vote.--Jebulon 11:54, 17 September 2011 (UTC) Bonne image. (Il y a deux ans, j'avais pris une photo presque identique de ce lieu magnifique; ça me rappelle de bons souvenirs). -- MJJR 21:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Your signature on QIC page

Hello! Please sign your promotion from this edit on QIC page. Greetings ---- Jakubhal 22:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cugnon ME1aJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but some ca on the right --Someone35 10:24, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaën Mme Parisse - JPG01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R75 - 116 Pz Div - JPG2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambron-Casteau AB4a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 08:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand-Reng JPG01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:29, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Char T34 - Cal 85 - JPG1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments its a soviet Tank --Ralf Roletschek 10:14, 21 September 2011 (UTC)  Done Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catalpa bignonioides Aurea JPG1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Opprebais - Ferme-château (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecaussinnes-d'Enghien AR2bJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Stitching errors ?

Bonjour,

je viens de m'opposer à la nomination de File:0 Les Gilles d'Havré (1).JPG dans la CR des QIC. Je voudrais que tu la regardes de près s'il te plaît, je pense qu'il y a un problème grave avec ton appareil. On dirait que la photo est composée de colonnes et de bandes qui ne s'accordent pas entre elles. Il y en a partout, et trop pour qu'il ne s'agisse que d'une erreur de composition ou de "collage". C'est vraiment très visible notamment sur les visages, mais ailleurs aussi. Peux-tu jeter un coup d'oeil ?--Jebulon (talk) 13:36, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Bouillon - Château-fort et pont sur la Semois (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA in the horizon--Someone35 17:33, 18 September 2011 (UTC) --  Done seen and done Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 12:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC) For me it is QI. --Jakubhal 08:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rebaix ME1cJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 07:19, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Château de Logne - Vieuxville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 20:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tirailleurs algériens de Fosse-la-Ville - Havré.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaën 060823 (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enghien CH1bJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left side is a bit dark but the picture has a good quality and perspective. --Someone35 11:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambron-Casteau JPG05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 09:10, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renier de Huy JPG02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please do not change the perspective! --Ralf Roletschek 08:57, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Namur Snow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Anghy 09:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux - L'église décanale (1910-1912).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autorail diesel 4610 - Treignes.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tervuren ARB2JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taxodium distichum (Rendeux) JPG1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 06:50, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Odeigne Vi1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments i like such colors, QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek 10:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Moulbaix - Moulin de la Marquie (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tournai JPG02f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great framing/colors --CellarDoor85 18:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Gravelines - Fort de Vauban (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK (please see annotation)--Jebulon 15:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Enghien - Pavillon des 7 Étoiles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good.--Jebulon 15:08, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jef Lambeaux JPG1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Carpinus (resuite)

Bonjour Jean-Pol, j'ai finalement réalisé les images de mon site moi-même sans la majesté du charme que tu avais pris. Je t'invite donc à découvrir www.billot-sologne.com A bientôt peut-être sur les chemins de Sologne. Stéphane

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Dréhance - Château de Walzin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not convinced - a bit tilted maybe? Hard to tell. Mattbuck 11:35, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Good exposure, the focus is on the castle, i don't think it's tilted. QI for me. --Vassil 20:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Binsfeld (Luxembourg) 101021 V1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please see annotations.--Jebulon 09:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)) Done suivant conseils prodigués -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Looks good now, thanks. QI.--Jebulon 16:08, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 01 Bruges - Chocolate Corner - JPG2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You could easily cut off the disturbing thing at the left edge with a little perspective correction. En corrigeant un peu la perspective, tu redresserais l'image (vois les façades dans la rue à gauche, elles penchent) et te débarrasserais du bout de maison qui dépasse à gauche.--Jebulon 14:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC) Done suivant conseils prodigués -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 13:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)ça me parait bien mieux, merci. QI--Jebulon 16:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Ange d'A. Giorgetti - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 14:48, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Fiat 500 - Rome.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Fresque représentant Mercure - Musée du Vatican (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Vierge ornant la porte de Ste-Marie Majeure.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Jakubhal 16:33, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosaïque - Buste de Dionysos - Palazzo Massimo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 15:39, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Mosaïque - Buste de Satyre - Palazzo Massimo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice crop and good quality --Ralf Roletschek 16:53, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Pont et château Sant'Angelo - Rome (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reviewed. Please see annotations.--Jebulon 15:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC) Done suivant conseils prodigués Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 18:12, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Thank you, but it is not enough I'm afraid...--Jebulon 15:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Esneux AR7aJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 14:02, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Rhododendron - Celles (Hainaut) 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good--Lmbuga 14:31, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Aphrodite de Ménophantos - Pal. Masssimo alle Terme.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:19, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Chambre de Raphaël - École d'Athènes - Musées du Vatican.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Havré - Chapelle N-D de Bon Vouloir (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a dust spot in the sky at right (see annotation). :-) Otherwise good. --Cayambe 11:17, 25 September 2011 (UTC) Done Thank you, you were right. Corrected now -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 07:53, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Good now. --Cayambe 08:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)  Info Here has to be anywhere a problem in the nomination. --Carschten 18:23, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Forgotten signature

Hi Jean-Pol,

thank you for promoting my picture of the CN Tower. But you have forgotten here to sign. Please catch this up. Best regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:45, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 00 Strépy-Bracquegnies.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:15, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinus nigra JPG4Ad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Jebulon 16:24, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sorbus alnifolia 'Submollis' JPG1Ta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Céroux-Mousty 050910 (26).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torgny - Village 050615 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Ange de Paolo Naldini - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tilia insularis JPG1FeFl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and useful.--Jebulon 14:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments i like it, very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 15:31, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferula communis JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:29, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Couvin JPG01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Fanciulla offerente - Palazzo Masimo - Rome.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

requête identification conifère

Bonjour Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Peux-tu s'il te plaît identifier ce conifère, qui était ainsi début août 2011 en Dordogne ?

Merci de ton aide précieuse.

--Jebulon (talk) 23:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Salut et merci de ta réponse.

Finalement, je me suis adressé à "Quelle est cette plante" du projet botanique de la wikipedia en français. Ils m'ont répondu tout de suite, de façon argumentée et précise.

C'est un Pinus sylvestris, pin sylvestre.

Je tire mon chapeau à leur réactivité et à leur savoir, immense mais modeste dans l'expression, et toujours amicalement offert à tous.

Et je te remercie aussi d'avoir pris le temps d'examiner ma photo. J'ai ainsi pu la proposer en QI avec une Id. acceptable.

A bientôt.--Jebulon (talk) 15:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

je ne comprends pas très bien comment fonctionne ta page d'utilisateur. C'est normal ?

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bray-Dunes - Le bateau dans les nuages.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment ISO 9.264???? --Carschten 10:23, 27 October 2011 (UTC) If anyone can explain why this strange information is given by the metadata, I would appreciate. Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 12:38, 27 October 2011 (UTC) Me too! --Carschten 15:00, 27 October 2011 (UTC)At least one, maybe more, dust spot(s) in the sky.--Jebulon 15:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC))  Done -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 21:45, 27 October 2011 (UTC) Looks OK to me. Rama 14:49, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Circus Maximus et Domus Augustana - Rome 111001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me. -- Rama 07:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbaye de Bonne Espérance 01 JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me. -- Rama 07:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 La Hulpe - Étang de la Longue Queue (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Liquidambar stiyraciflua - La Hulpe (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Pterocarya fraxinifolia - La Hulpe (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Félicitations !!

Salut Jean-Pol Grandmont.

Je viens de voir que ta photo de Douaumont fait partie des dix vainqueurs du concours Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 France !

C'est un magnifique et remarquable succès ! Te rends-tu compte ? Distingué parmi plus de 25.000 clichés !!

Je me réjouis vraiment pour toi, et je suis ravi d'être parmi les premiers à te féliciter !!--Jebulon (talk) 09:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Parrotia persica - Parc de Mariemont (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 La Hulpe - Étang de la Longue Queue (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice--Lmbuga 01:25, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Concours Wiki Love Monuments 2011 (réponse)

Oui dans le jury ton travail remarquable n'est pas passé inaperçu ;)

Je n'ai fais partie que du jury, pas de l'organisation. J'étais d’ailleurs étonné de ne pas t'avoir vu à la soirée, j'aurais bien aimé te rencontrer en vrai. Le mieux est de contacter les organisateurs pour recevoir ton prix et savoir pourquoi tu n'étais pas au courant de cette soirée, vraiment dommage... --Luc Viatour (talk) 10:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine Sainte-Thérèse - Domaine de Mariemont.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, good quality. Mvg, Basvb 22:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Clervaux Cadran solaire 101021.JPG

Bravo pour ta photo, vraiment très jolie. A mon avis, faudrait la placer sur cadran solaire. --PierreSelim (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clervaux Cadran solaire 101021.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good quality & useful, I would crop the shadow on the right. PierreSelim 13:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)  Done -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 14:55, 22 November 2011 (UTC) Useful and Good quality. --PierreSelim 16:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --ArildV 09:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harchies RN1dJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo (analog photos?).--ArildV 09:30, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer spicatum JPG1L.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, sharp and clear--Stu Phillips 23:42, 25 November 2011

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castanea dentata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. I would do a less tight crop. --Gidip 10:47, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liriodendron tulipifera JPG5a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:33, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

0 Haltinne - Château.jpg

Hallo, I was not really convinced by the new version, so I made an own try. Feel free to rollback if you don't like it. --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pleurotus ostreatus JPG2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI.--ArildV 10:06, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Ange à la couronne de P. Naldini - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but the sky is a bit noisy, and there is a slight CA. Could you please remove the many dust spots (some are annotated). All correctible IMO.--Jebulon 17:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)  Done suivant conseils prodigués -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:12, 27 November 2011 (UTC)For me, good now, thank you.--Jebulon 11:35, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hensies RN1cJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too excessive noisegrain reduction? Lost a lot of detail. See also images note.--ArildV 09:32, 24 November 2011 (UTC)  Done Please check the new version -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:32, 27 November 2011 (UTC) OK now IMO.--ArildV 09:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Botassart - Tombeau du Géant (1)JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:35, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Bruxelles - Petit Sablon - Blanchisseur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oui.--Jebulon 14:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Prunus serrulata - Kalmthout (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:03, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Betula uber JPG1Fe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, although crop a bit too tight --Gidip 19:31, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer griseum JPG01b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Gidip 19:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Publicité murale - Houdeng-Aimeries.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- MJJR 22:17, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Signature

Bonjour, je crains que tu n'aies oublié de signer ta dernière proposition d'image de qualité de l'Ange sur le Pont-Saint-Ange à Rome.--Jebulon (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thieu - Canal du Centre 080109 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tarcienne Eo1b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Persée et Méduse

Bonsoir Jean-Pol GRANDMONT.

Je te remercie d'avoir jugé que mon Persée était de qualité suffisante. Je dois néanmoins te signaler, pour la bonne forme, que j'ai modifié l'image depuis ton vote. Un de nos amis (Archaeodontosaurus) m'a fait remarquer par mail que le socle souffrait d'une aberration de perspective. Il a raison, j'ai donc corrigé. L'image étant techniquement meilleure maintenant, cela n'a pas vraiment d'importance, et je ne l'ai pas mentionné sur la page des propositions. Mais je crois devoir à l'honnêteté de te prévenir au cas où tu souhaiterais revenir sur ton premier choix.

Bien amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 18:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

PS amusant: as-tu un rapport avec Marie-Claire ? Elle est de Mons comme tu sembles l'être, et a fait la même faute en anglais sur sa page de présentation ("somme images I've uploaded"), avec deux "m" à "some", comme s'il s'agissait de la Somme en France. Marrant, non ? --Jebulon (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonifacio Cal1JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit oversharpened but overall ok. --kallerna 18:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Sallertaine - Moulin de Raire (1).jpg

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

je vous remercie pour le mot que vous m'avez adressé suite à mes premières requêtes de QI. J'ignorais l'importance de ce critère de perspective redressée. Contributeur depuis longtemps sur fr.wiki, je suis encore débutant sur commons. Du coup, j'ai modifié cette image, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hôtel_de_préfecture_de_la_Loire-Atlantique_-_Nantes.jpg, avant de la soumettre ce matin-même à la sagacité de tous :)

Cordialement, Selbymay (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Aiguilles de Bavella JPG1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:28, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Seneffe - La volière du château (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 11:33, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pholiota squarrosa JPG3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Twig on left side is distracting. --Gidip 19:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)  Support QI & Useful (Tu devrais mettre une échelle ou donner cette information dans la légende, ce serait parfait) --Archaeodontosaurus 17:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC) -- Merci pour ce conseil dont je tiendrai compte à l'avenir.

Ville-Sur-Haine

I loved your image of the old bridge there. Did you happen to also make one of the Passerelle George Price? It would make a nice addition to the WP article about him.LeadSongDog (talk) 22:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Quercus suber JPG1.jpg

J'aime bien ce chêne, mais on ne voit pas bien le tronc. or les informations sont là tu devrais pouvoir les "sortir". Si tu as le temps intéresses-toi à VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ajaccio San1JPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Moonik 08:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Ange au titulus de Giulio Cartari - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good work and nice composition. --Haeferl 18:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sorbus 'Leonard Messel' JPG1b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful good caption

QIC

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

Merci pour tes bonnes intentions et les remarques sur l'amélioration de mes images. C'est chose faite pour le Fichier Folie_Saint-James.jpg dont j'ai redressé la perspective et j'ai recadré un peu plus serré. La nouvelle version est déjà rechargée et disponible sur Commons. Par ailleurs, j'aime beaucoup tes photos pour leur beauté et leur ambiance. Les couleurs de l'automne sont si bien captées, avec ce brin de lumière qui donne aux choses une nouvelle vie. N'ayant pas encore beaucoup d'expérience technique j'ose pas toujours les promouvoir, laissant la place aux expertes des aberrations chromatiques et d'autres poussières. Cala ne m’empêche pas de respirer leur atmosphère et de les admirer. Bien à toi --Moonik (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

• Merci Jean-Pol --Moonik (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto-Vechio Port1aJPG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pancratium illyricum JPG1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me --Stu Phillips 15:32, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/0 Quercus suber - Filitosa JPG1.jpg

Bonjour,

Il semble qu'il y ait un problème dans la création de la candidature pour une image de valeur. Pourrais-tu la refaire ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 04:41, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Je confirme, tu as utilisé la mauvaise ligne pour "introduire" ton image; c'est la première pour les photos simple et non la seconde pour les SET que tu as utilisé. le mieux et de mettre : Withdrawn dans la ligne Statut et de recommancer sur le bon formulaire. Nous avons tous eu des début difficile avec les "mystères" de VI... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enghien 050918 (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 16:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Rencontre Wiki Loves Monuments

Bonsoir M. GRANDMONT,

Un petit message pour vous réaffirmé ma sympathie suite à notre échange lors de la cérémonie de remise des récompenses du concours Wiki Loves Monuments.

Vous m'aviez demandé un lien vers quelques autres de mes photos : sur mon compte flickr, vous pourrez trouver l'ensemble de ces photos, dont l'intérêt est très variable.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigpilou/

Dans l'attente de vos nouvelles.

Bien cordialement,

Pierre-Louis FERRER

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Davidia involucrata 'Vilmoriana' 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyssa sylvatica JPG1b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice --Taxiarchos228 10:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fraxinus excelsior 'Aurea pendula'.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cambron-Casteau JPG04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice --Moonik 12:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

File:0 Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris.JPG

Bonsoir Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Désolé d'avoir envoyé Notre-Dame de Paris à la "revue consensuelle", mais je pense qu'elle ne peut pas être promue en l'état. Tout le long de presque toutes les lignes verticales (et de certaines statues), en grande taille, il y a des lignes rouges-magenta vraiment visibles, qui sont dues au soleil couchant. Je trouve par ailleurs que ce n'est globalement pas assez net, et il y a par dessus le marché des zones surexposées. Je pense que c'est améliorable, mais peut-être pas au point d'amener une promotion.

J'espère que tu ne m'en voudras pas !

Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 17:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Bonne renommée vaut mieux que statue dorée

Bonjour Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Merci de ta vigilance sur la statue du pont Alexandre III que tu connais bien. Tu as eu parfaitement raison, et j'ai donc écarté cette photo de la liste. Je l'ai retravaillée, et la reproposerai prochainement. Je crains d'avoir voulu aller trop vite pour cette image, heureusement que tu étais là.

Pour info, j'ai à proposer une image du même sujet que toi ("ronde des amours"), j'attends que ta promotion prenne effet afin qu'il n'y ait pas de concurrence (as-tu remarqué le cadenas -love padlock ?- sur la patte du crabe ?), mais ça sera amusant de comparer.

D'ici là, je te souhaite une bonne soirée de Noël, et je me réjouis de continuer à partager avec toi de belles images.

Bien cordialement.--Jebulon (talk) 12:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Lampadaire du Pont Alexandre III - Ronde des amours.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit noise but good composition and colours --Mbdortmund 02:14, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Haltinne - Château.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Sculpture du Pont Alexandre III - Néréide (A. Massoulle).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Jebulon 02:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Voeux

Cher ami d'outre-Quiévrain et collègue du Pont Alexandre III,

Merci infiniment de tes vœux qui me touchent.

Reçois les miens en retour, pour toi bien sûr et, hors de "Commons", pour ceux qui te sont chers.

Je me réjouis à l'avance de partager encore avec toi, cette année, de belles images.

Bien amicalement,--Jebulon (talk) 10:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Voeux II

Tous mes Voeux pour 2012 pour toi et ta famille et que l'aventure wikipedienne continue! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Voeux III

Merci pour tes voeux! A mon tour, je te souhaite une bonne année, pleine de bonheur ... et de belles photos, bien sûr! -- MJJR (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Bonne année !

Bonjour,

Tous mes vœux pour l'année 2012 ! Puisse-t-elle être une année de rencontres, de découvertes et de comptes-rendus photographiques passionnants.

Rendez-vous pour WLM2012 ?

Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 18:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wood sculptors at work, sculpteur sur bois..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful, but the quality is far too low IMO (color too warm, wrong white balance). It fails the criterion 3 in this case. Could you maybe improve this one ?--Jebulon (talk) 13:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Improvements have been made -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
• Merci. Pardon de pinailler: est-ce vraiment de l'ébénisterie et non pas plutôt de la sculpture sur bois ?--Jebulon (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment C'est effectivement un sculpteur sur bois.
•  Support Nothing wrong. Useful and relevant. VI--Jebulon (talk) 14:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
the Houille river in Givet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Question Why is this a valuable scope? --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose - nice image, but scope far too narrow. --Claritas (talk) 10:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I suggest: "the Houille river in Givet" from scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment OK I agree with the suggestion of --Archaeodontosaurus -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The scope has changed I confirm my positive vote.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:39, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agapanthus praecox subsp. orientalis, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - best in scope. --Claritas (talk)
•  Oppose I don't see this image within the scope provided.--Jetstreamer (talk) 21:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

10:37, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm not a botanist, but I'm pretty certain it's identified correctly. --Claritas (talk) 21:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment You are both right. the scope was badly formulated (see the new syntax) must also be reduced to "flower". The scope has changed it is necessary that the first positive vote is confirmed. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Claritas (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met now.--Jetstreamer (talk) 10:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:40, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

2012

Jean-Pol, merci pour les voeux. A mon tour je te présente, bien tardivement mais avec d'autant plus de plaisir, mes meilleurs voeux pour 2012. --Cayambe (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Fresque et stucs - G. Muziano - C. Nebbia - Galleria delle carte geografiche.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The composition is nearly symmetric, perhaps it should be cropped on the right side to make it symmetric. --Berthold Werner 18:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC)  Done it was true! Good quality now. --Berthold Werner 18:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Spa JPG05.jpg

Dear Mr. Gradmont,

I should like to inform you that I have used your image uploaded on wikimedia commons in my book „Nur wer tot ist, geht kein Risiko mehr ein“ a history of 20th century casino gambling, published at the German Libri Bod, ISBN: 978-3-8448-0977-0, on page 23, credit on page 597. Thank you for making the work available.

Yours faithfully

Henry Lohner, Munich, Germany --Zenwort (talk) 09:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC) User: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Zenwort

Bien vu

Merci pour la correction. --Agamitsudo (talk) 09:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Award

	Paréidolian photographical award
	For all the excellent photographic additions and your great work on Commons Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Filemover

Hi Jean-Pol. I've added the filemover right to your account. If you'd rather continue to use rename requests, I'm happy to rename files for you. I just wanted to give you the choice. INeverCry 19:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Palais Stoclet

Bonsoir Jean-Pol. Belle image du Palais Stoclet! Vous me demandez mon avis sur la proposition de la supprimer sur Commons. Lorsqu'on applique la loi belge sur les droits d'auteur, je crois que votre photo ne peut en effet pas être publiée, pour la simple raison que l'architecte est décédé en 1956, c'est-à-dire il y a moins de septante ans. Le fait qu'il s'agit d'un monument classé au patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO n'y change rien. C'est évidemment complètement dingue et absurde - et révoltant pour un wikipédien pur et dur - mais même les lois stupides doivent être appliquées... Vous avez la malchance que quelques intégristes s'acharnent contre cette image. Ils ont malheureusement la loi de leur côté. Maintenant il faudra attendre 2026 pour publier l'image sur Commons - à moins que quelqu'un ne trouve la formule magique pour la faire passer quand-même d'une façon légalement acceptable.

Tout à fait autre chose: avez-vous participé cette année au concours WLM? L'année passée c'était un franc succès pour vous! Moi-même j'ai de nouveau participé, non seulement en Belgique, mais aussi aux Pays-Bas et en France. Je suis curieux ce que cela donnera, tout en ne me faisant pas trop d'illusions. Cordialement, Marc Ryckaert - MJJR (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC).

Bonsoir et désolé de cette réponse tardive. En effet, je rejoins les propos de MJJR. Il est vraiment dommage de ne pas pouvoir publier ce genre de photos. J'en ai moi-même fait les frais avec certaines photos de sculptures et peintures murales trop récentes. Il est temps que la loi belge s'assouplisse à ce niveau-là.

Je profite de cette intervention pour saluer le travail remarquable que vous fournissez depuis de nombreuses années sur Commons. Cordialement, JNélis 18:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:L%27Alleud_-_Butte_du_Lion_dite_de_Wateroo.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BelfortGent.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:01_Houdeng-Goegnies_050323_(3).JPG). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.169.5.71 17:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

2013!

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année ! Respectueusement, Georges -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Fin d'année

Bonsoir Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Nous ne nous sommes que peu croisés cette année, car j'ai le sentiment que ton intérêt pour les labels de type "QI" s'est sérieusement émoussé.

Quoi qu'il en soit, j'espère que 2013 te sera aussi fructueuse en belles images que les années précédentes.

Reçois ici mes voeux et mes pensées amicales.

--Jebulon (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

ps:en parcourant ta page, je m'aperçois que tu as eu des déboires avec des demandes de suppression, la loi belge étant semble-t-il aussi bête et stupide que la loi française (ou italienne). Ici en France, nous faisons un "lobbying" intense auprès du Parlement et du Gouvernement pour la faire évoluer, mais si ça se trouve, on devrait essayer de faire changer les choses auprès de l'Union Européenne !--Jebulon (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Jean-Pol GRANDMONT.

Merci de ton aimable réponse.

Le fait que je sois membre cotisant de l'Association "Wikimedia France" n'implique en aucune façon que j'aie disposé de quelque information que ce soit relativement à WLM 2012, événement auquel, tu l'auras peut-être remarqué, je n'ai aucunement participé, à la différence de l'année précédente...

Je continue, quant à moi, à présenter mes images dans le cadre classique et quotidien des "QI" et parfois des "FP", ce qui, confronté au jugement des autres, me permet de progresser.

J'y trouve toujours autant de plaisir, malgré les déboires du "No FoP" !!

Amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 14:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Bonne Année 2013

Je te remercie de tes bons vœux, et d’adresse les miens pour toi et ta famille. Tes images ont toujours une belle lumière, et même les objets inertes donnent l’impression qu’ils sont vivants. Je le vois avec d’autant plus d’envie que les miens sont morts avec une lumière de scialytique qui les décrit bien, mais ne fait pas rêver. Bien amicalement. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Vœux

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

Merci pour tes vœux! A mon tour je te souhaite une belle année 2013, pleine de lumière et de bonheur. Et avec une riche moisson en images, bien sûr. Cordialement. -- Marc (MJJR (talk) 10:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)).

Bonjour Jean-Pol ! Je rejoins MJJR dans ses remerciements, et te souhaite une très bonne année 2013 qu'elle soit riche en belles photographies ! Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 13:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Fichiers sans licence

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

J’ai remarqué que les fichiers suivant ne portent pas de licence. Je suppose qu’il s’agit d’une erreur. Je peux me charger d’apposer un {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} si tu le souhaites.

• File:0 Sainte Waudru - Mons 1.JPG
• File:0 Centaurea montana - Centaurée des montagnes (1).JPG
• File:0 Vaccinium myrtillus - Vallorcine (1).jpg
• File:0 Mons - Rue Cronque - Médaillon architectural .JPG
• File:0 Sourbrodt - Église Saint-Wendelin (3).JPG
• File:0 Havré - Allée de peupliers noirs du château de Beaulieu.JPG
• File:0 Prunus avium - Havré (2).JPG

Amicalement, Jean-Fred (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

• • Bonsoir Jean-Frédéric,

Merci pour ta vigilance et ton offre d'aide. Il s'agissait effectivement d'un oubli que j'ai immédiatement solutionné dès que j'ai vu que les fichiers avaient été modifiés par Moogsi.

Amicalement, Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

C’est parfait, tout est bien qui finit bien :-) Bonne continuation, Jean-Fred (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

0 Naming

Hi. I've noticed that you lead your image titles with a "0". My impression is that you do that to place your images first in category pages. I must say that I find that a bit questionable. Not that many of your contributions wouldn't deserve an early mention if our categories were sorted by quality. /Dcastor (talk) 12:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Dcastor,

The identification of my file is in no way associated with their classification in the Commons but a classification system that I use in other area.

Just to be convinced to see a category such as this one.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ancient_Roman_reliefs_in_Rome

Here you can see that my files are not systematically placed at the head of class.

However, you are free to think what you want.

Regards

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Excellent photographs indeed. Chrs84 (talk) 01:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Confirmation

Bonjour,

J’ai vu que tu as été au château de Pierrefonds (très belles photos au passage), pourrais-tu confirmer ou infirmer que la photographie File:Château de Pierrefond.JPEG représente une partie de ce château ? (vu le style d'architecture, j’ai comme un léger doute).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Edelseider a trouvé que ladaite photo représente l'Abbaye de Saint-Jean-des-Vignes. Problème réglé.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

PS: il y a un bug sur cette page, les sections ne sont pas modifiables individuellement (surement une balise ou un modèle mal fermé quelque part).

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 en France, 25 September 2013

Votre photo File:0 Ambleteuse - Fort Mahon (2).JPG a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du 25 September 2013. Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot.

--Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

File:0 Coffre d'une urne en albâtre - Groupe Anfora Liscia - Museo Gregoriano Etrusco.JPG

Hi Jean-Pol. Could you please fix the parameter error in your file? There are more files of yours in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter and Category:Pages using Artwork template with incorrect parameter. --Leyo 09:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiLovesMonuments

	Winning image
	Hey, one of your images was selected as a winner in this year's WLM edition. Your image was selected out of a total of 3600 images. We want to celebrate you, and invite you for the award session on November 5, 19h, in Brussels. You can contact me on md@wikilovesmonuments.co.za MADe (talk) 07:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg

Eleassar (t/p) 13:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

2014 !

	* * * 2014! * * *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Chevron

Chevron has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mjrmtg (talk) 12:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

File:0 Le Massacre des Innocents d'après P.P. Rubens - Musées royaux des beaux-arts de Belgique (2).JPG

Hallo Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, tu as placé ce file du l'atelier du Rubens qui se trouve en Belgique comme peinture original d'Ontario dans les articles dans des autres langues aussi et c'était beaucoup de travail pour les corriger.[9] [10][11][12][13] [14][15] [16]--Oursana (talk) 01:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Jean-Pol GRANDMONT⧽: العربية, български, Deutsch, English, ‎français, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎മലയാളം, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska, اردو, 中文

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

COM:MDR

Bonjour. J'ai vu que tu avais initié un grand nombre de propositions de suppression. Celles-ci concernent souvent des fichiers ayant le même sujet. Je voulais juste te conseiller, au cas où tu ne connaîtrais pas cet outil, d'utiliser Help:VisualFileChange.js. Il permet d'inclure dans une seule proposition de suppression plusieurs images qui se trouvent dans une même catégorie ou qui ont été uploadées par le même utilisateur. Cela permet de centraliser les discussions concernant la suppression et de catégoriser facilement les propositions de suppression. Meilleures salutations. BrightRaven (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Jean-Pol GRANDMONT⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

M4 Sherman Tank, fr;wikipedia

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

Tout d'abord, félicitation pour vos photos.

J'envisage d'utiliser votre photo "Sherman A4 - JPG1a.jpg - Shermans en mouvement à Hyon (Belgique)" pour illustrer l'infobox en tête de l'article M4 Sherman dans la wiki française que je suis en train de compléter (la photo figure déjà dans la galerie en bas de page mais je la trouve parfaite pour illustrer l'article).

Pourriez-vous svp me donner un peu plus de détail sur cette photo (circonstances etc.) - éventuellement en anglais pour que les autres utilisateurs puissent en bénéficier également ?

In English, for other users : congratulations for your pictures. Could you provide more info on "Sherman A4 - JPG1a.jpg". I am thinking of other usages in Wikipedia. Many thanks in advance. Sincerely.

Merci d'avance. Très cordialement.--Domenjod (talk) 11:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Cher Monsieur Grandmont,

les archives départementales de l'Aube ( FRANCE) souhaiteraient utiliser votre photographie de l'abbaye de la Cambre pour illustrer un catalogue d'exposition sur les abbayes cisterciennes qui sera publié en 2015. Les crédits photographiques seront recpectés. Pourriez vous me contacter à l'adresse suivante compte.arch3@cg10.fr? j'ai besoin de renseignements afin de vous envoyer un exemplaire du catalogue une fois celui-ci édité.

Cordialement, Pauline F. Archives départementales de l'Aube.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze

Hallo Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Nouveau modèle utilisateur

Salut.

J'ai créé un nouveau modèle utilisateur : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2

Je l'ai utilisé sur ma page utilisateur.

Cordialement. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:56, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Concerne la photo de Campanule raiponce, sur Wikipédia

Bonjour,

votre photo représente la Campanule fausse-raiponce, (Campanula rapunculoides) et non la Campanule raiponce (Campanula rapunculus), qui a des fleurs dressées. Vous pourriez fournir cette photo pour l'article de la fausse raiponce. C. Hennequin, botaniste

Burdinne SNCV

I took some pictures in Category:Burdinne_SNCV_station. This place is freely accesible. One Wikipedian wanted more pictures of the watertower. Could you visit the place? With the TEC buses it takes me to much time from the Netherlands to go there again.Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:45, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen

Hallo Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Inversion de légendes

Bonjour, il semblerait que vous ayez inversé deux légendes (c'est ma région natale, je l'ai de suite remarqué) Le chateau de Walzin et celui de Celles (qui est en fait le Chateau de Vêves) sont inversés.

File:0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg

@Jean-Pol GRANDMONT: that file is missing on your user page. Deleted? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:51, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:0 Serres Royales de Laeken (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:0 Serres Royales de Laeken (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Σπάρτακος (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

About one foto

Hello. I would like to ask you about this foto File:Clabecq JPG01.jpg. When it was made? Blast furnace chip worker (talk) 21:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Contact

Dear Jean-Pol Grandmont, I tried to reach you via the email-link mentioned on the website - but could not get through to you. Please contact me via my email address (suttner.thomas@gmail.com). It is about one of your pictures (Couvin). Thank you very much in advance. Best wishes, Thomas

Deleted file

Hi Jean-Pol GRANDMONT why has this file of your been deleted? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:41, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Question regarding one of your photographs

Bonjour!

Regarding your photograph depicted here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:De_Coydeberg_Aleyde_JPG1.jpg Do you have any information on when the stained glass for the window was made? I have a friend who is interested in heraldry, but she is hoping that the depiction is before 1600.

Many thanks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Justin_Eiler — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justin Eiler (talk • contribs) 18:38, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Monument à Tournai

Bonjour,

Vous avez pris il y a déjà plusieurs années, une photographie File:070215 Tournai (30).JPG prise à Tournai. Savez-vous si le sculpteur de ce monument est bien Camille Debert (1866-1935) ? Merci, car je voudrai faire un article sur ce sculpteur. Robert Valette (talk) 10:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

J'ai pu vérifier que le sculpteur est bien Camille Debert ; merciRobert Valette (talk) 22:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016

Bonjour Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

En 2014, vous avez participé au concours photo Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. Nous organisons aussi ce concours de photo en 2016.

• Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments en Belgique & Luxembourg
• Site web de Wiki Loves Monuments (international, autres pays)

Nous organisons aussi 4 balades photo à Gand, Malines, Anvers et Liège. Visite : http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/fr&setlang=fr

Soyez les bienvenus ! Romaine 15:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Eclairs

Hello, why is the background of your eclair picture blacked out? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89clair#/media/File:0_Frameries_-_Boulangerie-p%C3%A2tisserie_Godefroid_(8).JPG —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2606:6000:F0D1:2700:ECC6:D95C:D43E:CAA4 (talk) 03:34, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Misidentified photograph File:0 Geranium sylvaticum.JPG

• 

  your photograph

• 

  Geranium sylvaticum

• 

  Geranium sylvaticum (alpine form)

• 

  Geranium sylvaticum flowers

• 

  Geranium pratense

• 

  Geranium pratense flower

Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,
Your photograph above (leftmost image in the gallery) shows typical Geranium pratense, not Geranium sylvaticum. The main differences of G. pratense vs. G. sylvaticum are these: G. pratense has larger, more blue and less reddish/liliac flowers without a clearly distinct white zone in the middle and usually much narrower leaf lobes. I corrected the ID of your photograph, but please note that it should also be renamed to avoid any confusion.
With best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 15:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:0 Verdun - Cimetière de Douaumont (1).jpg

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Alors si mon fichier image ne peut pas être considéré comme un "De Minimis, il y lieu de toute urgence de supprimer aussi les autres fichiers qui montrent encore plus clairement l'ossuaire de Douaumont dans la catégorie « Douaumont ossuary ».

Cordiales salutations

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 01:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	15 stars out of a possible 10! These are the most photogenic pictures of my ancestral castles I have found to date. I can't wait to use them in my book. I would have emailed you to let you know, but have no idea what language you're speaking. Heather Urban (talk) 00:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Demoted FP

Sadly one of your FP nominations was demoted to 'not featured' due to a sock double vote. However, you are welcome to re-nominated if you like. The nom is: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:0 Serres Royales de Laeken (1).jpg. --Cart (talk) 18:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Image usage on the Travel Channel

Hello Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

My name is Courtney and I represent a production company outside of Minneapolis, MN. We are putting together a series for the Travel Channel and would love to use one of your images on the show.

Could we use the image you've uploaded titled "0 Mosaico pavimentale – Grotte Celloni – Pal. Massimo.JPG"?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:0_Mosaico_pavimentale_%E2%80%93_Grotte_Celloni_%E2%80%93_Pal._Massimo.JPG

Please feel free to contact me at courtney.reistad@committeefilms.com to discuss further.

Best, Courtney Reistad --Court020 (talk) 16:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

wa.wikipedia

Hi! You have uploaded some files to wa.wikipedia with an unfree license. Perhaps you could relicense them so we can export them to Commons? --MGA73 (talk) 20:36, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello again! I moved one of your files here: File:Nameur JPG W1.jpg. It was GFDL so that was okay to move. --MGA73 (talk) 19:17, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

@Jean-Pol GRANDMONT: I don't know if you have seen this message so I try again. Is it possible that you would relicense your uploads on wa.wikipedia to a license that is usable on Commons? If yes then I can move them here for you and you can check and fix information if needed. --MGA73 (talk) 13:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi dear Wikipedian,

I just see your message. You can move the files concerned with my actual licence

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:

You may select the license of your choice.

Thank you for your help. Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 08:34, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! So far I have moved these files:

• File:Ate-dilé-Brugelete.jpg
• File:Castia.jpg
• File:Chieve 1.jpg
• File:Chieve 2.jpg
• File:Codeûze di magnåves bolets.JPG
• File:Coneu (Cinse Grandmont).jpg
• File:El Rû.jpg
• File:Helvella sulcata.jpg
• File:Hydnum repandum (1).jpg
• File:Li codeûze d' ârmilieres.jpg
• File:M4A1 Sherman II.jpg
• File:Magnåve bolet - Boletus edulis.jpg
• File:Masbor.jpg
• File:Oraye di tchet.jpg
• File:Pacsile erôlêye - Paxillus involutus.jpg
• File:Polipôre di beyôle - Piptoporus betulinus.jpg
• File:Polyporus squamosus - Polipôre ås peletes.jpg
• File:Sint Nicolê.jpg
• File:Tchampions walons.jpg
• File:Tiesse di moenne - Clitocyba geotropa.jpg
• File:Tieuziye.jpg
• File:Tregne 1.jpg
• File:Tremele djelêye - Tremella mesenterica.jpg
• File:Vile-so-Inne 2.jpg
• File:Violete burute - Ascocoryne sarcoides.jpg
• File:Walcoû .jpg
• File:Suillus grevillei 3.jpg

Later I will check if I can move other files. --MGA73 (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

And:

• File:Tricholoma saponaceum - Tricolome odant l' savon.jpg
• File:Macrolepiota rhacodes 2.jpg

2 more --MGA73 (talk) 13:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

OK ! Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:36, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello again! I moved this file too File:Cwadran solêre (Eglîje St-Nicolê di Véroce).jpg I take it that you are the photographer. If not you can just nominate it for deletion. --MGA73 (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

I just see your message. You can move the files concerned with my actual licence because it is my own file. Thanks a lot for your help ! Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 12:38, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gedinne 050717 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Éventail chinois - Musée de la Compagnies des Indes (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:57, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Merci pour les photos Larmor Plage... j'aurais aimé vous adresser un mail de "reconnaissance", sans succès malheureusement. J'ai utilisé certaines de vos photos sur mon blog : http://www.scrapdemonik.com/ Scrapdemonik (talk) 11:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Exploitation de vos photos

Bonjour M. Grandmont,

Merci beaucoup pour votre réponse. Je vous suis très reconnaissant de soutenir mon projet.

Vous écrivez : "Vous pouvez utiliser sans problème mes images en respectant les conditions de licence." Je ne suis pas un expert dans le domaine des licences, mais j'ai appris de Wikimedia que les trois images en question ont des licences CC BY-SA 2.5 et 3.0. La description de la licence se lit comme une licence pour une distribution ultérieure sur Internet, mais j'aimerais publier un guide de randonnée imprimé.

Il serait très courtois si vous pouviez confirmer que les licences sont également valables pour le "monde hors ligne" ou si vous pouviez confirmer l'utilisation des trois images dans mon livre de randonnée. Ce sont des photos de L'Homme près de Forrières et des églises de Smuid et de Hotton. Je mentionne votre nom en tant qu'auteur des photos et des licences dans le répertoire d'images qui se trouve dans les mentions légales du livre.

Si vous souhaitez et vous êtes interessé, je peux vous envoyer un fichier pdf du livre et, dès qu'il sera terminé, une copie - mais en allemand.

Bien à vous Markus Kaiser

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Jardins et château de Vaux-le-Vicomte (6).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:12, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Mir - 1er juin 2013 à Dunkerque (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Maincy - Château de Vaux-le-Vicomte (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 01:25, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Maincy - Château de Vaux-le-Vicomte (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

duplicate-tagged

Hi Jean-pol, do you mind the duplicate-taggin of File:0 Venise, pluie dans la Fondamenta Riva Olio.JPG and File:0 Venise, Fondamenta Riva Olio.JPG or is it o.k. for you?

OK Turelio vous pouvez supprimer le fichier 0 Venise, pluie dans la Fondamenta Riva Olio.JPG|Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Grotte de Meudon

Bonjour, il y a sans doute une confusion dans le descriptif et dans les catégories du fichier Grotte de Meudon. Il s'agit bien de l'ancienne Grotte de Meudon (détruite en 1705) mais celle-ci était bel et bien située à Meudon et non pas à Vaux-le-Vicomte. Voir aussi Category:Grotte de Meudon. Je te laisse le soin de renommer et de rectifier ou bien de me mettre un mot sur ma page de discussion si tu préfères que je m'en charge. Bonne continuation. --Bohème (talk) 15:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Bubo virginianus - Grand-duc d'Amérique (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weird look on that owl's face, but image quality is pretty good! --Etaped 16:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Arras

Bonjour, pourriez-vous télécharger une photo du 12 rue Ronville moderne, où se trouvait la brasserie du grand-père maternel de Robespierre? Peut-être même un portrait de Jacques-François Carraut? Si vous ne pouvez pas chercher quelqu'un qui peut le faire? Merci!

Pouvez-vous le rechercher? Merci! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.245.233.160 (talk) 08:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

François de Robespierre

La tombe du père de Robespierre est située dans l'ancien cimetière de Salvatorkirche à Munich. Vous pensez pouvoir télécharger une photo? Peut-être même un portrait de lui? Si vous ne pouvez pas chercher quelqu'un qui peut le faire? Merci!

Pouvez-vous le rechercher? Merci! —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 95.245.233.160 (talk) 08:27, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Botassart - Chapelle de l'Immaculée Conception (1)B&W.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Out of focus on the borders --Wilfredor 21:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC) done, thanks!!! --Ezarate 23:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality.Although I must accept that I have a weakness with black and white photos, although details are lost when giving a lot of contrast, it also makes it look like an old photo --Wilfredor 13:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:0 Détachement du 3e Bataillon parachutiste défilant devant le roi - 21-07-1989.JPG

Copyright status: File:0 Détachement du 3e Bataillon parachutiste défilant devant le roi - 21-07-1989.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:0 Détachement du 3e Bataillon parachutiste défilant devant le roi - 21-07-1989.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Fayet-Ronaye - Village - JPG1.jpg

File:Fayet-Ronaye - Village - JPG1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lapkasse (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

File:0 St Georges à cheval - Albrecht Dürer - BRB Bruxelles - Mac's - Hornu.JPG

File:0 St Georges à cheval - Albrecht Dürer - BRB Bruxelles - Mac's - Hornu.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 10:44, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Heritage Belgium 2021

Beste vriend van Wikimedia België, U hebt meegedaan met de fotowedstrijd. Gelieve het juryrapport te lezen. Helaas hebt u niet gewonnen. Toch hartelijk dank voor uw bijdrage; vanaf 1 juli kan u opnieuw deelnemen.

Cher ami de Wikimedia Belgique, Vous avez participé au concours photo. Veuillez lire le rapport du jury. Malheureusement, vous n'avez pas gagné. Cependant, merci beaucoup pour votre contribution; vous pourriez participer à nouveau à partir du 1er juillet.

Dear friend of Wikimedia Belgium, You have participated in the photo contest. Please read the jury report. Unfortunately you did not win. However, thank you very much for your contribution; you can participate again from July 1st. Geert Van Pamel (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Merci !

Bonjour Jean-Pol, très belle image que cette mosaïque de Ferrucci & Ligozzi : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:0_Le_Pape_Cl%C3%A9ment_VIII_Aldobrandini_-_Ateliers_m%C3%A9dic%C3%A9ens,_sur_un_projet_de_Jacopo_Ligozzi_(2).JPG

Belle image vraiment, à l'aspect étonnamment moderne, et je trouve que le cliché lui rend bien justice. Merci pour le partage !

Je viens de l'employer pour illustrer cet article sur Wikipédia que je souhaite faire « labelliser » prochainement si possible : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/L'Amour_victorieux

-- Frédéric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frédéric-FR (talk • contribs) 22:19, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

File:0 Vincent Gonzague, duc de Mantoue - Frans Pourbus le Jeune (1).JPG

File:0 Vincent Gonzague, duc de Mantoue - Frans Pourbus le Jeune (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antitumint4 (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

File:0 Vincent Gonzague, duc de Mantoue - Frans Pourbus le Jeune (2).JPG

File:0 Vincent Gonzague, duc de Mantoue - Frans Pourbus le Jeune (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antitumint4 (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 0 Pavement mosaic - Season bust - Pal. Massimo (Rome).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments rotation of image left blank spaces, see blue lines below and to the right of mosaic --Virtual-Pano 09:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)) done --Ezarate 22:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Woods

Woods has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)