User talk:Raul654 - Wikimedia Commons

Hello - thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects - this is possible only if the images can be found by other people. To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should either place the images on topic pages (galleries), or put the images directly into a category, or do both. Which of those possibilities is preferred is however a matter of debate, see here.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now, see Commons:Really unused. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do! Thank you. -guety 03:02, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Commons admin[edit]

Congratulations ! You are now Commons admin. villy 15:03, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks :) Raul654 20:27, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

License of recordings from pianosociety.com[edit]

Hello, I'm not sure if you are the right person to contact because Raulbot may be used by others, so if you are not the uploader of the files please forward this message. It seems that the files you've uploaded aren't in the public domain. Your quote concerning the license ("Piano music of any composer is accepted as long as it is not copyright restricted.") has nothing to do with the copyright of each performance. http://www.pianosociety.com/index.php?id=164 says that the "copyright pertaining to the recordings on this site belong to respective pianists". The following text makes clear that these files aren't in the public domain. I'm afraid that these files have to be deleted. --Baikonur 14:15, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I looked for that license info, but couldn't find it. You're quite correct, they all need to go. Raul654 19:26, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

All the copyvios are now deleted. Raul654 23:12, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Sufficient attribution of files from http://hebb.mit.edu/FreeMusic/[edit]

Hi Raul, because cc-by-sa requires attribution I wonder if it is sufficient to state the source of the file but not the creator. The page says "The artists who created this music worked hard, and while they don't expect payment in the form of money, they want recognition for their efforts. In other words, give credit where credit is due. If your use does not make these tags easily accessible, please give proper credit elsewhere in your product. It's just common sense. Please respect it.". Therefore I think MIT Concert Choir should be credited on the description page. --Baikonur 15:48, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I considered that. However, there are non-choir recordings in there (remember, I slurped the whole site, and not just the MIT music section). When I transcoded them, I took particular care to use a program which preserves the ID3 tags so the attribution info is still there. On the other hand, keeping track of who-recorded-what on the image page was just not feasable - I would have spent longer doing than everything else combined. Further, I don't think the statement he makes ("if your use... product") refers to us because, in fact, we *do* keep the tags fairly visible - anyone who listens to the music will see the tag. I think that he meant specifically for people who use it in some other form - playing it aloud, or anaylsis, or any of a million other uses where you are not seeing the software decoder. Raul654 16:01, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hacking the script to spew out the OGG tags and their content in Wiki format shouldn't be too hard, although perhaps a separate bot to grovel through all the commons audio and ensure that the tags are there would be nice... (In fact, it might even be nice if the Wiki software displayed tag contents on audio description pages) --Andrew 03:54, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

With some more hacking (thanks to Avar and Dysprosia's help), the script now echo's ID3 tag info into the upload description. Raul654 06:30, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This URL is now 404. Is there updated attribution information? --Brion VIBBER 07:20, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I hand-updated all the image pages to include 'performed by' information gathered from the OGG ID tag. There were a small number of files (Six - Jsbach bwv996 01.ogg through Jsbach bwv996 06.ogg) that did not include this information to begin with and thus cannot be further attributed. Raul654 19:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yay.[edit]

Category:Hebrew pronunciation, even there currently appears to be some cache problem or something of that sort - and only one file is displaying. Nadavspi 06:19, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Tadamichi Kuribayashi[edit]

Regarding Tadamichi Kuribayashi.jpg, I'm unable to give you official info about the source. I'm going to see if I can email the author of the website from where the image was downloaded. -- Get_It • 16:00, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm going to email the contact thats on this website, and also try to find the image on NARA's webpage (NARA's search engine sucks, so this might take some time). -- Get_It • 16:10, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Ibiblio sports a picture that claims to be from the US Marine Corps, so I've gone ahead and uploaded that over the old image and replaced the talk page. Raul654 16:19, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

w00t!, but I didn't read your message, and I already have sent a email :S

Well, if it is public domain, we will have 2 images \o/ -- Get_It • 16:30, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Wired CD tracks[edit]

Links are broken on the songs from the Wired CD. Additionally, the songs are originally mp3:s, they've been converted from mp3->ogg? --Rdnk 18:13, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I removed the Wired CD tracks because they're CC-by-SA-noncommerical -- I just haven't gotten around to deleting them from the master list. Raul654 21:33, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Longwood Gardens[edit]

Thank you for all your excellent photos from Longwood Gardens! Perhaps you could put them in a wikimedia commons collection "Photos from Longwood Gardens", to which we could link from en:Longwood Gardens. --Zantastik 06:44, 2 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, right now, I've just uploaded the individual plant pics (e.g., w/ latin name, cropped and centered on the target plant). I have more encompassing shots (fountains, sundials, topairies, etc) that I was going to upload later and add just those to the article. I don't envision linking linking to all 180+ pictures from that article - that would be just excessive. On the other hand, I do have the full thumbaniled view in my picture gallery. Raul654 06:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

BTW, if you link the Latin name, it makes it easy to see if there is already a gallery for that species already. At some point I think we should consider making categories for images from particular botanical gardens, to aid in correlating our pics with their holdings. Stan Shebs 15:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also beware of overwriting, Image:Lobularia maritima1.jpg overwrote a picture of a completely different specimen, and we want both available. Stan Shebs 16:18, 2 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Music[edit]

If there's not a really good reason otherwise given, I'm going to delete all of the music files you uploaded on April 8-9. There's no differentiation between copyrighted works and things that are out of copyright; all are labeled as public domain which appears quite negligent. --Brion VIBBER 21:43, 15 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Misidentified plant from DC05 run[edit]

Image:Zingiber malaysianum.jpg is misidentified, has been placed on Plants misidentified. Looks like a philodendron to me. -- Phyzome is Tim McCormack 21:09, 26 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's entirely possible I made a mistake. Raul654 22:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:KimLiPark.png[edit]

Hi, when you copy images from Wikipedias, don't forget to add the name of the copyright owner plus date of first publication. Thuresson 05:50, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:EM-0004-03.mpg.ogg[edit]

Please add a description, a source and a license for this recording withing a week. Thuresson 21:03, 11 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's an ogg theora I uploaded for Brian0918 (who was having trouble converting it from mpg). It's a public domain NASA video. I've gone ahead and added that information to hte image page. Raul654 15:30, 12 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, I also added a description. Somebody should make a rock music video out of this :) Thuresson 15:42, 12 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For some reason, as soon as I read that, I imagined that video with the last 2 minutes of Stairway to Heaven playing :) Raul654 15:48, 12 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Purcell hear my prayer, o lord.ogg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Purcell hear my prayer, o lord.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Thuresson 13:40, 24 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've tagged and sourced it. Raul654 16:58, 24 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:NYC meetup 5.jpg[edit]

Hi, can you verify that you are the photographer of this photo? Thuresson 19:54, 28 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, I did indeed take that one. Raul654 20:56, 28 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If you check the en image page, it's actually not *quite* GFDL -- my meetup pics are GFDL-if-the-people-in-the-picuture-agree-wikipedia-only-otherwise. I don't think it'd be a big issue getting SJ, Anthere, and Jimbo to agree (SJ is the one who uploaded it here and tagged it as GFDL, after all). Raul654 21:00, 28 July 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Compiler[edit]

Hi Raul. I was just trying to get an image for pt:Compilador (compiler) which would be simple to understand. You are right, but I didn't read the en: article, so I couldn't understand why there was a flow between Lang1 and Target1, idem to 2. Actually, I was based on the spanish version, but credited yours since it was based on yours. However, it doesn't mention the frontend thing, which lead me to fail to understand why there was that double flow. BTW, perhaps you could recat your image to Category:Programming. Anyway, the purpose was to *not* enter at *that* detail, so a simple comparison to Image:Nt-bytecode.png could be possible side-by-side to explain en:Bytecode (actually, pt:Bytecode. This image will probably grow on complexity, however, and might include the front-end issue you just reported, which is a good idea to illustrate. I'll try to complete it when I have the time. Thanks for the reminder! -- Nuno Tavares ☜ ^PT 06:23, 11 October 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An image for deletion[edit]

Image:Waruga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. It had a wrong licence in the Polish Wikipedia, it is actually non-free. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. -Hapsiainen 23:16, 29 October 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Goliath beetle2.jpg[edit]

This image is of an elephant beetle (Megasoma elephas elephas).--Ons (60.35.186.87 13:00, 18 November 2005 (UTC))Reply[reply]

I've fixed it now. Raul654 02:28, 24 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Media of the day[edit]

How does one submit files to do? Zach ^{(Smack Back)} 05:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, it's actually quite simple. Like the selected anniversaries on the enlish Wikipedia, the media files are displayed on an infinitely repeating loop. The data is pulled from the two lists shown at Commons:Media of the day - one list has the file names and the other list has file descriptions. To change what file is shown on a partiuclar day, simply edit both lists accordingly. I populated the lists, but I don't expect them to be immutable. Some things (especially Handel's Messiah) are overrepresented (for lack of alternatives) and if there are other files I didn't know about, I'd like to see them put into the rotation. Raul654 05:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Raul, if we want to use the "media of the day" in the main pages of other languages (e.g. german) do we have to add descriptions? (like Template:Motd-de/01-1 instead of Template:Motd-en/01-1 ) And will they automatically change to the other description page? btw: it´s a nice feature :) bye --MilesTeg 01:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

With some help from Southpark on IRC and Sam916, MOTD is now on the german front page. I tweaked my script I used to generate Commons:Media of the day to include a german descriptions column. Raul654 02:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

White Pelican[edit]

Hi. I noticed that your impressive image at Image:Pelecanidae_onocrotalu.jpg is misnamed. It should be Pelecanus onocratalus. —JerryFriedman

Don't blame me - blame the good folks at Disney's animal kingdom who misprinted the sign ;) Raul654 00:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

image[edit]

This image certainly looks like a Lemur catta and not a Eulemur fulvus collaris (which is now E. collaris now, BTW). - UtherSRG 20:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are correct (good catch) Raul654 20:54, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ps - I have fixed it now. Raul654 21:20, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Connochaetes taurinus albojubatus.jpg[edit]

Hi, Image:Connochaetes taurinus albojubatus.jpg is a photo of the Common Eland (Taurotragus oryx). --Rooivalk 13:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How[edit]

hi Raul,

I noticed your video on the main page. Do you use a windows based program to create ogg video? If so, which? tia, TeunSpaans 05:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes - I posted instructions here Raul654 05:40, 10 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, since some people find the program (ffmpeg2theora) a bit daunting to use, I posted idiot-proof instructions here Raul654 05:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

idw Image:Giovanni Boldini.jpg[edit]

Image:Giovanni Boldini.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Giovanni Boldini.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Teofilo 12:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Orphan Images[edit]

Hi - thanks for all your great work here. I just noticed that you uploaded a lot of files that can currently not be found by others, because they are not categorized and on no gallery page. Uncategorized files are useles to others! Especially as an admin, please act as an example to others... thanks! -- Duesentrieb^(?!) 17:25, 17 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Marshallia graminifolia.jpg[edit]

Hello Raul! Are you sure, that you really meant Marshallia graminifolia and not Marshallia grandiflora? According to Plants USDA, M. graminifolia is missing around Washington DC, whereas M. grandiflora is reported from Maryland - see [1]. Moreover, the images I found from M. grandiflora are more similar to your plant than the images of M. graminifolia. --Franz Xaver 15:16, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've emailed the address the USBG has listed on their site. Hopefully they'll get back to me soon. Raul654 04:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, does this mean, the photo is from USBG? "Taken around Washington DC" does not sound like a photo from a botanical garden. This could also explain Image:Engelmannia peristenia.jpg, another species that has no natural occurrrence around Washington DC - see [2]. Regards --Franz Xaver 07:14, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, the pictures I took on that date include (but are not limited to) pictures I took at the USBG. Raul654 07:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks --Franz Xaver 08:20, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The professionals aren't quite sure either, but appear to be leaning towards graminifolia (which is what it was labelled as) -- "I can see why there might be a discussion on this...I'll probably have to go back and look at it later when it's blooming...I'm not sure I have enough to go on right now. Grandiflora should have petiolate leaves; graminiflora not...these look to be without petioles. I'll check with the person who collected it and get his opinion." Raul654 15:52, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! So we will have to wait some more time, until the other person has been contacted. Anyway, in USBG both species are possible, as the origin of the plants need not be from nearby. For me, it seems difficult to decide, if there is a petiole or not. This is easier with broad leaves. One leaf - not very well developed - seems to be contracted into a petiole. --Franz Xaver 17:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re:Translation[edit]

I'm very sorry Raul, I didn't notice it was the English template. Thank you for revert it and warn me. Anna 19:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Jacob-angel.jpg[edit]

See [3]

Thanks. Cary "Bastique" Bass ^parler _voir 16:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-l subscription[edit]

Hello Raul654,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 23:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perdón (Help:Convertir video)[edit]

Perdón.

—Nethac DIU, siempre dispuesto a hablar aquí—
12:03, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Crested heron.jpg image deletion (for renaming)[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Crested heron.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ezeu 02:10, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, it's possible that I made a mistake in naming that picture. Raul654 02:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Song of the Wanderer.ogg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Song of the Wanderer.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Fred Chess 09:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC) .Reply[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Hi Raul,

I saw your uploads and thought that you may be interested in Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life

regards, and keep up the good work!

TeunSpaans 20:24, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bot[edit]

Hallo
There is a template for bots for using it in the babelbox. you only need to add

{{babel-1|bot}}

to the userpage of your bot. With greetings. Augiasstallputzer 14:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Admin news[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC) P.S.: Pardon if this is a repeat (bot debugging...)Reply[reply]

Image:Ira Hayes.jpg.jpg[edit]

Please see, this image have a problem with license tag. --Panther 10:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fixed. Raul654 14:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! --Panther 19:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:FDR memorial.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:FDR memorial.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Julo 22:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Free music[edit]

Hi, I noticed you uploaded a bunch of free music with the source given as http://hebb.mit.edu/FreeMusic/. Unfortunately that site doesn't exist anymore! Has it been moved somewhere else? —An gr 06:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If memory serves, the pages are still viewable through the internet archive (so if anyone gets antsy about the copyright, they can go there) but the music itself is more-or-less gone. As to the reasons - I haven't a clue. It's quite unfortunate - it was a very good source. Raul654 16:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Okay. I wasn't antsy about copyright; I was just looking for more free music! —An gr 16:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What you are asking is very, very difficult. One lead I got was at Wikimania. I talked to the guy in charge of the Internet Archive, and told him the problem - that there is very little free music and most of what exists are either records made 80+ years ago (and, as a result, of poor quality) or performed by amatuers (again, poor quality). He gave me the contact information for a guy at IA who might be able to help, but I have not had the chance to follow up (I don't have the contact information rihgt now because I'm traveling). Raul654 16:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Moonlight Sonata opus 27.ogg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Moonlight Sonata opus 27.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

--Leonard Vertighel 16:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

License of the music files from "Free Music"[edit]

Hi Raul, since you mentioned that the pages of "Free Music" (http://hebb.mit.edu/FreeMusic/) still viewable through the internet archive,
I read the pages and found that the music files from "Free Music" are not really distributed under CC-BY-SA 1.0

According to the page -> http://web.archive.org/web/20010921031852/http://hebb.mit.edu/FreeMusic/
The music files are distributed under "EFF OAL 1.0, or any later version"[4], until July, 2004.

"The works herein, even those which do not currently have an ID3 or other tag, 
 are distributed under the terms of the EFF Open Audio License version 1.0, 
 or any later version, at your option."

Since July, 2004, they are distributed under CC-BY-SA 2.0[5].

http://web.archive.org/web/20040717080905/http://hebb.mit.edu/FreeMusic/

"The audio recordings herein, even those which do not currently have an ID3, 
 Vorbis, or other tag, are copyrighted by their creators, 
 and are distributed under the terms of the "Attribution-ShareAlike" Creative Commons License. 
 You must not modify or delete any fields in the Vorbis comment or id3."

The music files are distributed under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5[6] after July, 2005, until the website closed.

http://web.archive.org/web/20050715012906/http://hebb.mit.edu/FreeMusic/

"The audio recordings herein, even those which do not currently have an ID3, Vorbis, or other tag, 
 are copyrighted by their creators, and are distributed 
 under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
 
 You must not modify or delete any fields in the Vorbis comment or id3.
 
 …but note that I'd love to see these recordings used as mood, 
 ambience, or telephone hold music, since the normal stuff used therefor is dreck. 
 Please contact me for details and express permission."

So that, they are not distributed under CC-BY-SA 1.0,
but CC-BY-SA 2.0 (because you uploaded them before July, 2005 but after July, 2004 ).

Could you please help us to check it and find out whether it is true or not.
And if it is true, then please help us to correct the license tags of the music files.

Thanks a lot !

-- Microphone 15:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Creative commons licenses are irrevocable. If those files were ever licensed under CC-BY-SA (which they were, both directly and indirectly, by virtue of the fact that they were licensed under the EFF OAL 1.0) then they will forever be licensed under that license. Raul654 01:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I know that CC licenses are irrevocable. BUT if these files are licensed under "EFF OAL 1.0, or any later version", then,
they should be directly licensed under EFF OAL 1.0 [7] and indirectly licensed under CC-BY-SA 2.0,
because of the words "or any later version" and according to the page of the EFF OAL license [8],

"EFF designates the 
 Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license (which links to the page of CC-BY-SA 2.0) 
 as version 2.0 of the Open Audio License".

"Works licensed under "OAL, any version" can be used interchangeably with
 Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0. "

-- Microphone 04:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image Tagging Image:MvRichthofensFokker.jpg[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MvRichthofensFokker.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Svencb 21:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Festival of the Lion King.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Festival of the Lion King.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Rtc 09:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Star-spangled banner.ogg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Star-spangled banner.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Rtc 10:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Multimedia.png[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Multimedia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Yonatan ^talk 13:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Chopin Nocturne.ogg[edit]

This file (as the source shows) is under a non-commercial license and has been marked as such. Lcarsdata 19:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Moonlight_Sonata_opus_27.ogg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Moonlight_Sonata_opus_27.ogg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

The performer (Kyle, a friend of mine) is given on the image page. I fail see what is missing. Raul654 20:53, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Licensing[edit]

A few moments ago I uploaded a cropped version of this picture uploaded by you. Perhaps you could verify whether I used the correct licensing? Maarten (Please leave a message after the beep) 23:18, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Jom kippur war.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Jom kippur war.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

--Abu badali 14:20, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nominate MOTD[edit]

How does one nominate media of the day? I'd like to nominate my video Media:Elephant Mud Bath.ogg . Isewell 21:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

One does not ;) - the list is supposed to be static. But there's a few holes remaining, so I'll plug this into one. Raul654 00:57, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Erroneously atributed Quality Image[edit]

Hello Raul,
It seems QUCbot made a mistake when parsing nominations. I received the following notice on my userpage, even though I was the one who reviewed your photo, not the one who uploaded it (which was your bot), not even the one who nominated it. I will mention this issue to the QICbot maintainer. Here is your promotion message:

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hydrangea macrophylla - Hortensia hydrangea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Gershwin copyright[edit]

Hello,

You seemed to have removed the copyright violation tags that I put on Image:Gershwin_Prelude_No_2_Brian_E_Young.ogg last Summer. While the performer has licensed this recording, the copyright holder (ie the publisher or the composer's estate) has not done so. Having had dealing with the Gershwin estate in the past, I think that it would be in the best interests of the project to delete this file as a definite copyright violation, unless it can be proven that the copyright holder has given written permission to WMF to use this work. (Here is the work's listing on ASCAP as "Three preludes [9] I hope that you will understand that I have put back the copyright violation tags on the file. Gretab 09:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Amazing_grace.ogg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Amazing_grace.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Duesentrieb ⇌ 14:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:O Solo Mio.ogg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:O Solo Mio.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 13:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Rosemary_potatoes.jpg[edit]

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 03:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

User:PanchoHardy[edit]

Could you check out this user? He has been uploading many pictures and claiming them as his own (such as Image:Image:HBKElbow.jpg, which he couldn't own the right too since the only people in the cage besides the wrestlers and ref was a cameraman. Even IF he was the cameraman, WWE legally would own the pic, not him.) I suspect the other pics he's uploaded don't belong to him either. TJ Spyke 02:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:MP-Pavo_cristatus_14.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:MP-Pavo_cristatus_14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Karelj 22:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:MP-Pavo_cristatus_11.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:MP-Pavo_cristatus_11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Karelj 22:51, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Raul654!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. Patstuart (talk) 17:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Tiger1.jpg[edit]

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be deleted and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Featured picture candidates/Image:Ass.jpg[edit]

See Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ass.jpg. --Econt 11:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Media of the day[edit]

Hi, Raul654. I've uploaded few video files. Do I have to add category media of the day to them? Thank you.--Mbz1 21:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No, the media-of-the-day category is only for files that are actually in the media of the day rotation. You can see the rotation at Commons:Media of the day Raul654 18:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you. I still do not understand what should I do with my vidio clips in order for them to be considered as Media of the day. Could you please explain it to me, when you have a time? Thank you.--Mbz1 01:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, here's the deal -- when I set it up, we didn't have enough audio and video files to have a new one every day ad infinitum. So I set it up so that it loops - it has one file for every day of the year, 366 total (leap days are included). If you want to add a file, something has to come out of the rotation. There are some I would prefer to replace. In particular, we have 40-odd files from Handel's Messiah. If you see those except the Hallelujah chorus, feel free to replace them. Raul654 16:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photosubmission[edit]

You should advertise us more. In the photos that we get, put {{w|Wikipedia:Contact us/Photo submission}} for the source. howcheng {chat} 18:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Fred Brooks.jpg[edit]

Hello.

There is a problem with the permission “Can be copied for any purpose provided attribution to SD&M is given”.

It allows copying, but not derivative works or commercial use, which are necessary for the image to be free.

Please try getting a permission with that, or with a specific free license, like GPL+CC-BY-SA or something.

Mentioning {{Personality rights}} may be helpful when getting a permission in case they are worried about that.

--AVRS 14:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fixed. Raul654 16:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Amanda Gilman 2.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Amanda Gilman 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

--PageantUpdater 07:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Hello Raul654!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 13:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Kev Noir.jpg[edit]

Hello Raul654!

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 12:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Pageflakes_main.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Pageflakes_main.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

Martin H. (talk) 16:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Sarah Lee Guthrie, Johnny Irion.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sarah Lee Guthrie, Johnny Irion.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

"it can be freely used and modified by anyone" is a license -- I just didn't know what tag fits those particular terms. I've removed the erroneous no-license tag. Occasionally I will upload a pic from OTRS where the terms aren't so clear cut, with the expectation that somebody can find a tag that fits. Raul654 ( ) 18:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hm, i dont know what to do in this case. I think the tag {{Copyrighted free use}} would fit this conditions. --Martin H. (talk) 20:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

That tag seems appropriate to me. Raul654 (talk) 22:49, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright Status of various songs[edit]

Raul654: I have noticed that you uploaded and tagged various songs (all apparently from a United States Academic Decathlon Civil War music compilation) as "Released into the Public Domain" by the authors themselves. However, Kim and Reggie Harris' website lists all of their songs as still under copyright, and the archive.org sources provided for the following songs seem to now be inactive due to possible copyright issues. I would appreciate it if you provide further documentation validating the tagging of these .ogg files:

Follow The Drinking Gourd.ogg

Follow The Drinking Gourd.ogg
Battle Hymn of the Republic.ogg

Battle Hymn of the Republic.ogg
Bonnie Blue Flag.ogg

Bonnie Blue Flag.ogg

Thanks, Collegebookworm (English Wikipedia talk) 22:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Bonnie_Blue_Flag.ogg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Bonnie_Blue_Flag.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

The Invisible Hand (talk) 19:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Persian_local_woman.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Persian_local_woman.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. -Nard the Bard 18:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

It has been found that Image:Denis Noble.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Filbot.--Fil nik 06:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Brahms-waltz11.ogg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Brahms-waltz11.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

189.71.77.212 16:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi my name is Megan McMurray. Please email me at memcmurray@hotmail.com, I have a question about using a photo of yours in my book. Thanks, have a great day!

Please link images[edit]

Hello Raul654!

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Steve Wallach.jpg is uncategorized since 24 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Donald Becker.jpg is uncategorized since 24 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Bill Gropp.jpg is uncategorized since 24 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Abe Vigoda.jpg is uncategorized since 10 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Who - 1975.jpg is uncategorized since 26 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Lee Kernaghan.jpg is uncategorized since 26 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Pete Rozelle and George Halas.jpg is uncategorized since 27 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Steve Martin 2.jpg is uncategorized since 27 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Eddie Feigner.jpg is uncategorized since 27 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Mick Ralphs - Bad Company - 1976.jpg is uncategorized since 28 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Paul McCartney with Linda McCartney - Wings - 1976.jpg is uncategorized since 28 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:08, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Stalag Luft III.jpg is uncategorized since 2 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Stalag Luft III drawing.jpg is uncategorized since 2 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Bob Dylan and The Band - 1974.jpg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Robert Fripp 2.jpg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Mike Pinder.jpg is uncategorized since 3 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Sverre Bratland.jpg is uncategorized since 7 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Eric Schafer.jpg is uncategorized since 7 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Fall River Rovers.jpg is uncategorized since 7 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Arthur Kane.jpg is uncategorized since 7 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Thomas Eakins circa 1882.jpg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Thomas Eakins circa 1882 cropped.jpg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Edward Horner Coates.jpg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Arthur Loves Plastic.jpg is uncategorized since 12 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Charles Frederick Hughes.jpg is uncategorized since 14 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Battle of Dien Bien Phu map.png is uncategorized since 14 January 2009. BotMultichillT 06:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Differential power analysis.svg is uncategorized since 18 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Amelia Van Buren with Cat.jpg is uncategorized since 18 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:18, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Turkey Point Billy Smith.jpeg is uncategorized since 31 March 2009.
Image:John Biglin in a Single Scull.jpg is uncategorized since 9 May 2009.
Image:Pueblo Canyon.png is uncategorized since 30 May 2009.
Image:Clinton P Anderson overlook.png is uncategorized since 30 May 2009.
Image:The Wounded Man.jpg is uncategorized since 17 June 2009.
Image:B29 leaflet.jpg is uncategorized since 21 July 2009.
Image:Los Alamos Ranch School Seizure Letter.jpg is uncategorized since 2 August 2009.
Image:LANSCE 30th anniversary.jpg was uncategorized on 25 August 2009.
Image:Edgar Bolden.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2009.
Image:Mike Lehan.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2009.
Image:Manuel Flores.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2009.
Image:Jethro.jpg was uncategorized on 31 August 2009.
Image:Jim Tucker.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Iron Hill Brewery.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Patrick Ssenjovu.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Larry LaRocco 1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Suzuki cabinet.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Sophie Ward.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:DL Mills.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Eli Gold.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Fernando Corbato.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Mo Yan.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Suzanne Weyn.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer 3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Paul Zed.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:John Mann.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Washington University Public Zones.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Boss bailey.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Mike Birbiglia.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Chris Estes.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Lily Donaldson 2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Kasia Struss.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer 1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Alexei Filippenko.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Bob Hagedorn.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Maria Minna.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Sharif Ghalib.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Bob Colwell.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Xiaohui Ma.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Christian Audigier Photographed by Ed Kavishe for fashion wire press.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Betty Siegel.jpeg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Brian Weinstein.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Dave Syverson.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Isabel Toledo.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Lorraine Murray.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:David R Lewis.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Fran Reed.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Jack Dennis.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Sharron McClellan.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:William Orlando Darby 1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Giora Schmidt.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Omar Jacobs.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Charles Sharon.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Daniel Singer.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Quercus acutissima4.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Charles Thorn.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Chris Jaymes.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Marlee Scott cover.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Anna Wintour 2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Ray Brown Jr - Committed From The Heart.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Subpubic angle, male.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Thomas Sterling.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:The Essentials.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Kate Langbroek.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Rebecca West.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Craig Dimech.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:John Paul Hammerschmidt.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Jacob Tomuri.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Subpubic angle, female.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Jim Mullen.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Jourdan Dunn.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Washington University Public Zones2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Monty Denneau.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Colin Blunstone.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Parallelization diagram.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Mating plug.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Dov Frohman.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Chris Albrecht.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Tom Miller.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Ann Reed.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Diane von Fürstenberg.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Sophia Tupuola.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Sean Michael Wilson.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Dave Mejias.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Michael Flynn.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Rod Argent.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Hye Rim Park.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:John S Waugh.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Seth Putnam.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Split Aloe.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Stacy Brice.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:HMS Gurkha-F122 2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Quercus acutissima1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Carl Craig.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Granville Liggins.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Imam Hassan Qazwin 2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:M. J. Akbar.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Jennifer Santiago.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Declan Shalvey.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Abbey Lee.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Daniel Anscombe.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Catherine Asaro.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Quercus acutissima3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Diwa de Leon.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Antony Johnston.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:John Yap.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:HMS Gurkha-F122 1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Big Road Blues.ogg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Julia Nickson-Soul.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Han Jin.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Graham Gouldman.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Julio Ángel Fernández.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Dan Hubbert.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Kathleen Yearwood.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Nadeeka Perera.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Christopher Looby.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Alvin Kid Robinson.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:John Bahcall.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Ray Brown Jr Friends and Family Album.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Joe Darensbourg.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Michelle Fairbanks.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Dean Goss.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Sasha Pivovarova 2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Ruth Glick.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Ted Polhemus.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer 2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Merritt Wever.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Bruce Kennedy.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Imam Hassan Qazwin 1.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Andy Nelson Sr.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:The Zombies.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Judith Zaffirini.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Terri Hendrix.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Quercus acutissima2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:IBM 7030 Stretch circuit board.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
Image:San Felipe de Neri Church inside.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
Image:Cray I module.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
Image:Fermiac.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2009.
Image:Sketches for 'Home-Spun' (verso), Top of painting at right, by Thomas Eakins.jpg was uncategorized on 10 October 2009.
Image:Sweet beef 02.jpg was uncategorized on 13 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Sweet beef 06.jpg was uncategorized on 13 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Sweet beef 04.jpg was uncategorized on 13 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Sweet beef 03.jpg was uncategorized on 13 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Sweet beef 01.jpg was uncategorized on 13 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Sweet beef 07.jpg was uncategorized on 13 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Sweet beef 05.jpg was uncategorized on 13 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Lesley Lokko.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Advancement of learning.jpg was uncategorized on 9 April 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:03, 10 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:MW2010.jpg was uncategorized on 21 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Deviled eggs 5.jpg was uncategorized on 21 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Deviled eggs 2.jpg was uncategorized on 21 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Deviled eggs 4.jpg was uncategorized on 21 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:William Innes Homer.jpg was uncategorized on 21 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Deviled eggs 3.jpg was uncategorized on 21 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Deviled eggs 1.jpg was uncategorized on 21 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Eakins - Views of Harry.jpg was uncategorized on 6 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Eakins fan G133B.jpg was uncategorized on 9 June 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Watergate salad 2.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Watergate salad 1.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Watergate salad 4.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Watergate salad 3.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Letter from John Pickard to Thomas Eakins and response.jpg was uncategorized on 14 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:David Ferreira.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Fuller lodge los alamos.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:CraigRussell.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:David Harold Bailey.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Eric Alexander soccer player.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Lasana M Sekou.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Demodectic mange 2.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Eakins room at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Len Barry.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Carole Murray.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Demodectic mange 1.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Demodectic mange 3.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Patrick Bristow.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Robert Kellum.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Uqair.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Sharon Davson and Tom Burlinson.jpg was uncategorized on 10 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Addie Williams c1899.jpg was uncategorized on 27 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Kiyoshi Tanimoto.jpg was uncategorized on 2 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:John Hersey.jpg was uncategorized on 2 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Wilhelm Kleinsorge.jpg was uncategorized on 2 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Terufumi Sasaki.jpg was uncategorized on 2 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Toshiko Sasaki.jpg was uncategorized on 2 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Hatsuyo Nakamura.jpg was uncategorized on 2 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Masakazu Fujii.jpg was uncategorized on 2 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Rembrandt Christ Driving the Money Changers from the Temple.jpg was uncategorized on 13 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Jacopo Bassano Christ Driving the Money Changers from the Temple.jpg was uncategorized on 13 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:El Greco Christ Driving the Money Changers from the Temple.jpg was uncategorized on 13 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:John of the Cross crucifixion sketch.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Author[edit]

I have seen your images File:Jasminum_sambac2.jpg and File:Jasminum_sambac1.jpg that do not mention an author. Probably it is you. If so could you add that and also a date. I added for you a link to a category. Thanks Wouter (talk) 23:04, 25 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

It has been found that Image:Lee Kernaghan.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Filbot.--Fil nik 14:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mt_Giluwe.jpg[edit]

File deletion warning

File:Mt_Giluwe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

ViperSnake151 (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Purcell ode. 8 in a consort of voices.ogg[edit]

Hi there!

Your bot uploaded this file with only 5kb and the duration is 0,00s which means there's nothing to listen to. Could you perform a re-upload please? It was recently MOTD but within 24h nobody took action...

Thanks, --Mattes (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's highly unlikely that I still have a copy of that file to re-upload. Raul654 (talk) 02:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

-/ ...Hmm, delete then? --Mattes (talk) 01:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unfortunately, yes, that would be the best thing at this point. Raul654 (talk) 19:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Administrative notice[edit]

Deutsch

Dear Raul654. I am writing to you to inform you that because of inactivity, you may lose your adminship on Commons.

Commons has a new policy on admin activity, Commons:Administrators/De-adminship, taken into use on June 13, 2007 (after a two-week poll on the proposed policy's talk page).

If you want to keep your adminship, you have to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days. Note that if you don't make 5 admin actions in the following 5 months, you will then lose the adminship anyways.

Thank you — Mike.lifeguard 17:01, 15 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heads up[edit]

File:Antonin Dvorak - symphony no. 9 in e minor 'from the new world', op. 95 - ii. largo.ogg has been nominated for deletion. Graham87 (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Graves registration service 1.gif[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:36, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Graves registration service 2.gif[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 02:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Traumatic insemination 2.jpg[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Traumatic insemination 1.jpg[edit]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:38, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

What is scibaby?[edit]

"Editing from 24.205.64.0/18 (your account, IP address, or IP address range) has been disabled by Raul654 for the following reason(s): Range used by Scibaby

This block has been set to expire: 05:43, 4 December 2013. "

My ISP is thru my cable provider, what do I do now?

File:Bertrand Gardel - Sketch for The Chess Players.png[edit]

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Smetana_-_Bartered_Bride_overture.ogg[edit]

File:Smetana_-_Bartered_Bride_overture.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jappalang (talk) 06:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ceiling cat.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ceiling cat.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--malo (talk) 00:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Robert M. Lindsay G335.jpg[edit]

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 04:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Template at Portuguese Multimedia Encyclopediae[edit]

Hello Raul how are you. I know you designed the Motd Template, congratulations that's a great work. I am one of the founders of this portuguese encyclopaedia , a multimedia platform that we would like to integrate with the image of the day of Commons. Can you help with it? Feel free to join our project. Kind regards JoanL (talk) 09:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AK_drum_performance.ogg[edit]

File:AK_drum_performance.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:12, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Multimedia.png[edit]

File:Multimedia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Svgalbertian (talk) 23:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Battle_Hymn_of_the_Republic.ogg[edit]

File:Battle_Hymn_of_the_Republic.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Julia_Nickson-Soul.jpg[edit]

File:Julia_Nickson-Soul.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 15:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

	Hello, Raul654. You have new messages at File talk:Julia Nickson-Soul.jpg#Author. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu \| беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ \| български \| বাংলা \| català \| čeština \| Deutsch \| Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ \| English \| español \| suomi \| français \| galego \| हिन्दी \| hrvatski \| magyar \| italiano \| 日本語 \| ქართული \| македонски \| മലയാളം \| Plattdüütsch \| Nederlands \| português \| română \| русский \| sicilianu \| slovenščina \| svenska \| Tagalog \| Türkçe \| 中文（简体）‎ \| 中文（繁體）‎ \| +/−

File:CaligaveruntVictoria.ogg[edit]

File:CaligaveruntVictoria.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 18:40, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 21:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Rodent photo upload[edit]

You recently uploaded File:Microtus chrotorrhinus 2.jpg from OTRS. The identification was incorrect, and we're discussing at my en: talk page (bottom of that thread) what it actually is. For that, it would be helpful to know where the photo was taken. Could you get that information from the photo author? Thanks, Ucucha (talk) 17:07, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Erik Satie - gymnopedies - la 1 ere. lent et douloureux.ogg[edit]

File:Erik Satie - gymnopedies - la 1 ere. lent et douloureux.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Marcok (talk) 11:23, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sweet Beef[edit]

Hi Raul,

Giorgio writing. I was categorizing pictures and I stumbled on the series of photographs made by you and entitled "Sweet Beef". Very nice pictures indeed and very good recipe as well, I guess. Thank you very much for having uploaded them even because there are a lot of people that are using Commons in order to get inspired by others even about cooking. I'm one of them. And, as far as I see, with your pictures you have perfectly illustrated how to cook the dish. I'd like to cook it too. That's why I'm writing. Could you please add to every picture a description that will be help me and all the others to repeat properly the very same steps as yours in order to reprepare the dish? For example in the first one the ingredients (quantities) and for the others what to cook (order) and how to cook (frying, boiling, for how long) the ingredients in order to not spoil them. I'm not skilled in cooking as you evidently are so, just watching the images, it's not enough for me to understand properly the preparation of the recipe. Thank you for your attention and I invite you to upload others photographic-recipes. Perhaps we can create a special category for that and to initiate a new Commons application! A last request: are you the inventor of the recipe? Did you invent others? --Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've done a few other recipes. I keep food photos on a subpage on Wikipedia here. I was going to add the beef recipe sooner or later, but since you asked for it, I've posted it here. I got that recipe from my fiance, who got it from her mother. Her mother got it from somewhere else. Raul654 (talk) 23:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

We need your help at the Wikiproject medicine[edit]

Hello, Sorry for spaming your talk page, but this is very important. On the behalf of the Wikiproject medicine at the en.wikipedia, I am inviting you to be a part of the discussion going on the project's talk page about Patient images, The discussion started after I obtained a permission to more than 23000 dermatology related images, and about 1500 radiology images. As some editors of the Wikiproject medicine have some concerns regarding the policy of using patient images on wikipedia, and regarding patient consents. Also they believe that common's policy is not so clear regarding the issue. And since you are the experts please join us at this very important discussion -- MaenK.A._Talk 14:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deprecated License[edit]

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Steve Leialoha.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 15:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Angel Medina.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

chicken parmigiana picture[edit]

how come it's so greasy? do you make your own sauce? thank you.

I took those pictures the first time I made it. And since it was the first time I made it, I made the mistake of using crushed tomatoes instead of pasta sauce. So it's not greasy - it's watery. I'm *very* surprised you noticed, though. Raul654 (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bad news ;)[edit]

Back in 2006, you selected a lot of Media of the Days. I think you were also a big player in setting it up.

Since MotD was on a yearly cycle, your choices were used for five years, with only a few changing.

However, after it finishes using the test data I copied over from this cycle for May, MotD will be on a new system, similar to PotD (and, as it happens, sharing a page with PotD for the translation work, though there's also its own page)

And so, as of June 1st... your old selections are no longer the default. We have broken free of your influence.

To reinstate your influence, feel free to add any media of firm licensing status to [[Template:Motd/2010-06]}. ;)

Cheers, lad! Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:23, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm aware of the changes you made. It's fine with me, as long as someone takes responsibility for keeping it maintained and translated. (MOTD as I set it up was quite intentionally designed to be low-maintenance).Raul654 (talk) 04:26, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Heh. Mainly joking around a bit - but, aye, it does need more people now. But I've been watching it, and, provided June goes well, I think we'll be fine.

Honestly, the main reason I did the upgrade was it was a little too low maintenance: Not enough people were watching it, so it was being used to sneak copyvio onto the main page. By combining it with PotD, there's a lot more eyes on it. I don't know if that'll be enough, but it can't hurt, and, in a few months, we will hopefully have enough people that we can go to the next level, and have an approval process. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recipes[edit]

Hi Raul, Giorgio writing. Thinking and thinking about your pictures, I have finished to become a great fan of your recipes. Forget what I wrote you in the past. Now, I have understood your way of illustrating. Yes, true, your pics are all mute and without description, but pictures alone are more than enough to fully understand the recipe, leaving, anyway, the cook to use his own fantasy. How I could be so blind. It's simply brilliant. Thank you very much for such an innovative way to use Commons. We are all waiting for more. Me, for sure. Sincerely your.--Giorgiomonteforti (talk) 15:56, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Imagination is not required - I'll be adding the recipe to wikibooks sooner or later. Raul654 (talk) 17:27, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

The file:Follow The Drinking Gourd.ogg isn't, I think, in public domain. The song is probably, but there is no prove of release in this license by the singers. Nemoi a parlé le 12:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Seeing as how Internet Archive took it down, you're probably right.; (If memory serves, it was previously posted there with a PD notice) Raul654 (talk) 16:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank God I found you![edit]

I sure hope you're still online, old friend. Please see the message I left here: [10]. I don't think this fellow is online and I pray that you are. Can you help an old, worn out Wikipedian? Thanks!! PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:14, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yea, I'm still up. What do you need? Raul654 (talk) 03:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nice to see you, I can assure you. Sorry about the redirect; I really had left the project for a little while and I forgot to change the redirect. The files are [11] and [12]. I think I still have your e-mail address, so I'll drop you a howdy if I do with an explanation. Thanks for the help; this really is urgent. PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS: PLease add [13] and [14]. Thanks, pal. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Yom Kippur War map.svg[edit]

File:Yom Kippur War map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Hohum (talk) 18:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

cc-by-sa-3.5[edit]

Hi, you uploaded several files with a cc-by-sa-3.5 license (Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:CC-BY-SA-3.5). The current version of CC is only 3.0. So technically there is no valid license information on these files. You might want to re-tag them as cc-by-sa-3.0. Thanks --Slomox (talk) 20:20, 29 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks - I've fixed them. Raul654 (talk) 03:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Iguana.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Iguana.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lycaon (talk) 12:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Out of process deletions[edit]

Note that only identical or sized down duplicates can be speedily deleted, see Commons:Deletion policy. Different artwork photos generally should never be speedily deleted, such cases usually are not trivial enough and require community review, i.e. regular DR. For example, you have deleted File:The gross clinic thomas eakins.jpeg (I've already restored it), but it was higher resolution, and moreover it was completely different, pre-2009 restoration version! Trycatch (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Hummingbird4.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hummingbird4.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lycaon (talk) 10:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jacob_Wrestling_with_the_Angel_by_Maurice_Denis.jpg[edit]

File:Jacob_Wrestling_with_the_Angel_by_Maurice_Denis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Johann Grimm - Et le lézard traversa la rivière... (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hummingbird4.jpg[edit]

File:Hummingbird4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MGA73 (talk) 20:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Freer_gallery.jpg[edit]

File:Freer_gallery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Missvain (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:MW2010.jpg[edit]

File:MW2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cholo Aleman (talk) 18:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mordechai_Vanunu.jpg[edit]

File:Mordechai_Vanunu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hold and wave (talk) 11:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This talk page in other languages:

De-adminship warning[edit]

Dear Raul654. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2011 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you a×p_de ^Hello! 16:47, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Writers in farm village.jpg[edit]

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Horst von der Goltz.jpg[edit]

Hi, you marked the image as PD-old even though you marked the author as "unknown". PD-1923 is all you can really claim, I fixed that. Please also add categories to an image you upload, you're an admin after all, thanks. Hekerui (talk) 15:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Hawksbill turtle range map.png[edit]

File:Hawksbill turtle range map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 13:28, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Patrick Bristow.jpg[edit]

File:Patrick Bristow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mathonius (talk) 11:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Raul654. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of your inactivity in the past six months.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at the current inactivity run page within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, OdderBot (talk) 11:04, 17 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nick Ross.jpg[edit]

File:Nick Ross.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Daniel Louis Rivas.jpg[edit]

File:Daniel Louis Rivas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:57, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

File:FDR memorial.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:NobodysDirtyBusiness.ogg[edit]

File:NobodysDirtyBusiness.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rd232 (talk) 17:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Smithsonian Air and Space.jpg[edit]

File:Smithsonian Air and Space.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Baldwin red devil.jpg[edit]

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Baldwin red devil.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Baldwin red devil.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kelly (talk) 16:19, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Chromatic Fantasia (Bach BWV 930).ogg[edit]

File:Chromatic Fantasia (Bach BWV 930).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.126.197.24 17:24, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Matsushiro daihonei00.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Matsushiro daihonei00.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 14:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Raul654. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 08:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:The Battle Cry Of Freedom.ogg[edit]

File:The Battle Cry Of Freedom.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—RP88 12:11, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Claude Debussy - clair de lune.ogg[edit]

File:Claude Debussy - clair de lune.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:47, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Comanche codebook 2.jpg[edit]

File:Comanche codebook 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ppong.it (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Christ's Entry Into Brussels in 1889.jpg[edit]

File:Christ's Entry Into Brussels in 1889.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 14:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Star Spangled Banner-Four Verses.ogg[edit]

File:Star Spangled Banner-Four Verses.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WTM (talk) 10:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Toucan.jpg[edit]

File:Toucan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MPF (talk) 23:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Cray I module.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cray I module.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Janacek - kacena divoka.ogg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Janacek - kacena divoka.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:San Felipe de Neri Church inside.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:San Felipe de Neri Church inside.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Media help[edit]

Commons:Media help has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

mq 20:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VAPE buro (talk • contribs) 20:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Matsushiro2006 1111.jpg[edit]

File:Matsushiro2006 1111.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Darklanlan (talk) 12:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your picture in a book[edit]

Your komodo dragon picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Varanus_komodoensis5.jpg was used in a Finnish book about animals. The book title is "Millaista on olla eläin?" (What's it like to be an animal?). 88.115.40.180 19:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey, that's pretty cool. Raul654 (talk) 15:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus2.ogv[edit]

File:Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus2.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

119.160.119.229 07:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:M. J. Akbar.jpg[edit]

File:M. J. Akbar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

103.66.4.57 14:58, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:M. J. Akbar.jpg[edit]

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mubasshir10 (talk) 15:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Motd/2009-08-22[edit]

Template:Motd/2009-08-22 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

154.149.121.194 15:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Iwo Jima flag raising in legos.jpg[edit]

File:Iwo Jima flag raising in legos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Oh Christmas Tree.ogg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS).} 19:28, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

MOTD Notification[edit]

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐

File:Blue Whale NE Pacific.ogg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

hi sir am English Canadien and I just found the true about CC.[edit]

Be the new big développer hostel in the Quebec! 69.156.17.62 08:14, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Louis Collins.ogg[edit]

File:Louis Collins.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Mississippi John Hurt died in 1966, which is less than 70 years ago. Also, Per Commons:Hirtle chart#Sound recordings, essentially all sound recordings published 1923–1971 are still copyrighted. For works published during this period, failure to include a copyright notice or to renew the copyright did not cause the copyright to expire. This work is almost certainly a copyright violation. Undelete in 2029 at the earliest.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : The helper5667.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Warren Commission exhibit 697 (JFK motorcade).jpg[edit]

File:Warren Commission exhibit 697 (JFK motorcade).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 20:20, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Princess X.jpg[edit]

File:Princess X.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Speravir 00:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Caruso-AveMaria.ogg[edit]

File:Caruso-AveMaria.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrei Romanenko (talk) 04:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CELLO LIVE PERFORMANCES JOHN MICHEL-Jason Marsh s Starfire.ogg[edit]

#invoke:Autotranslate Andrei Romanenko (talk) 14:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:JOHN MICHEL CELLO-MARIA NEWMAN SOLO SONATA OTHMAR 1st.ogg[edit]

File:JOHN MICHEL CELLO-MARIA NEWMAN SOLO SONATA OTHMAR 1st.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Template:Idw/lang

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Андрей Романенко.

And also:

File:JOHN MICHEL CELLO-MARIA NEWMAN SOLO SONATA OTHMAR 3rd.ogg ( Nominator : Андрей Романенко | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/John Michel's records )
File:JOHN MICHEL CELLO-MARIA NEWMAN SOLO SONATA OTHMAR 2nd.ogg ( Nominator : Андрей Романенко | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/John Michel's records )
File:CELLO ENCORES JOHN MICHEL-Jason Marsh Starfire.ogg ( Nominator : Template:Noping | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/John Michel's records )
File:JOHN MICHEL CELLO-Maria Newman s Birthday of the Infanta 2.ogg ( Nominator : #invoke:No ping | Entry page : Commons:Deletion requests/John Michel's records )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]